Talk:Lakitu & Spinies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→BIG KEEP: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth. | Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth. | ||
== BIG KEEP == | |||
its best to not merge it with lakitu. i mean spinys do damage on their own so their seperate enemys | |||
Revision as of 15:20, June 15, 2009
EXTREMELY STRONG KEEP, only because spinys appear elsewhere in other games, are backround characters in previous ssb games, and because they continue to stay alive after/if you defeat lakitu. Kperfekt722 (talk) 07:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Merge. Without the Spinies, Lakitu is worthless. They always work in pairs, almost never apart. And the AT is no exception. There's not even enough notable info to make a separate article. This is just a duplicate of Lakitu. - Gargomon251 (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge The Spinys can't be there without Lakitu!Amycats2 (talk) 21:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge. if lakitu didn't exist, these wouldn't exist JtM =^] (talk) 14:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
amycats2 and jtm are both wrong, as they are backround characters as well, and in mario games, spiny's appear without lakitu. KP317 (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth.
BIG KEEP
its best to not merge it with lakitu. i mean spinys do damage on their own so their seperate enemys
