Forum:Smasher namespace: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Again, it's the same discussion-read them. "It's too large" isn't an argument.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
#[[User:Lord Ryu|Lord Ryu]] 22:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | #[[User:Lord Ryu|Lord Ryu]] 22:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
===Undecidied=== | |||
#--[[User:Mudkipz|User:Mudkipz]] ([[User talk:Mudkipz|talk]]) 14:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
Yeah I'd like to see the Smasher articles in their own namespace. That way they won't get in the way of content and they can still keep their category.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | Yeah I'd like to see the Smasher articles in their own namespace. That way they won't get in the way of content and they can still keep their category.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 99: | Line 101: | ||
:::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | :::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
I really don't get the heck what your saying.--[[User:Mudkipz|User:Mudkipz]] ([[User talk:Mudkipz|talk]]) 14:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Consensus == | == Consensus == |