Forum:Smasher namespace: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Again, it's the same discussion-read them. "It's too large" isn't an argument.)
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
#[[User:Lord Ryu|Lord Ryu]] 22:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
#[[User:Lord Ryu|Lord Ryu]] 22:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


===Undecidied===
#--[[User:Mudkipz|User:Mudkipz]] ([[User talk:Mudkipz|talk]]) 14:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
==Comments==
==Comments==
Yeah I'd like to see the Smasher articles in their own namespace. That way they won't get in the way of content and they can still keep their category.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I'd like to see the Smasher articles in their own namespace. That way they won't get in the way of content and they can still keep their category.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Line 99: Line 101:


:::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise.  --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:::I'd merge some of the useful info from [[SmashWiki:Smasher Project|Smasher Project]] into it as they seem to serve a similar purpose in the context of ''not'' taking them out of the main namespace but it's fine otherwise.  --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I really don't get the heck what your saying.--[[User:Mudkipz|User:Mudkipz]] ([[User talk:Mudkipz|talk]]) 14:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


== Consensus ==
== Consensus ==
Anonymous user