1
edit
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, August 21, 2008
, 16 years ago→New Idea for All Sysops
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
::Its not about whether or not you work hard, its about whether or not you'd be good with admin powers, if you understand the responsibilities, etc. If working hard was all that was needed, just about everyone on gwiki would be sysops. --[[User:Warwick]] 22:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ::Its not about whether or not you work hard, its about whether or not you'd be good with admin powers, if you understand the responsibilities, etc. If working hard was all that was needed, just about everyone on gwiki would be sysops. --[[User:Warwick]] 22:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::<small>edit conflict</small>Working hard doesn't mean that someone is deserving of sysophood. I've spent (literally) hours typing out single responses to things. Easy work? No. Should I be sysopped? (It'd make my life easier, but it won't happen.) Working hard makes it seem like sysophood is a reward for good work, which multiple admins (and common sense) say it isn't. If Silverdragon, Charitwo, Dtm and C-Hawk have been as fantastic as you say, they should have nothing to worry about. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 22:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ::<small>edit conflict</small>Working hard doesn't mean that someone is deserving of sysophood. I've spent (literally) hours typing out single responses to things. Easy work? No. Should I be sysopped? (It'd make my life easier, but it won't happen.) Working hard makes it seem like sysophood is a reward for good work, which multiple admins (and common sense) say it isn't. If Silverdragon, Charitwo, Dtm and C-Hawk have been as fantastic as you say, they should have nothing to worry about. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 22:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::<small> edit conflict </small> Do I really need to explain why "How about no." is not a legitimate reason to oppose something which, for all intents and purposes, would solve all of the wikidrama outright? Think about it Semicolon, if y'all reconfirmed the Sysops, you'd get your wish, I'd leave. – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 22:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | |||