14
edits
(→New Idea for All Sysops: new section) |
Pikamander2 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
I, Miles.oppenheimer, with support from MarioGalaxy and Defiant Elements, suggest the following strategy to deal with the current problems with both the RfA process and the blocking fiasco of late. Our recommendation is that ALL current sysops must reapply for adminship through the RfA process. If they fail this time through, they will be stripped of their admin powers. This idea, however, will strengthen the positions of admins who re-win their status. Note that this is not directed at any one sysop but at every last one of them. (See [[User talk:Defiant Elements|here]] for the thread where I first posed this idea.) I await your response. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|Miles.oppenheimer]] ([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|talk]]) 21:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | I, Miles.oppenheimer, with support from MarioGalaxy and Defiant Elements, suggest the following strategy to deal with the current problems with both the RfA process and the blocking fiasco of late. Our recommendation is that ALL current sysops must reapply for adminship through the RfA process. If they fail this time through, they will be stripped of their admin powers. This idea, however, will strengthen the positions of admins who re-win their status. Note that this is not directed at any one sysop but at every last one of them. (See [[User talk:Defiant Elements|here]] for the thread where I first posed this idea.) I await your response. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|Miles.oppenheimer]] ([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|talk]]) 21:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:How about no? <span style="color:#4CBB17">--Posted by</span> [[User:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">Pikamander2</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">(Talk)</span>]]</small> at 22:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC) |
edits