SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 20:47, August 18, 2008
, 16 years ago→page break
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
:::Besides I really don't think anyone here is eligible for a sysop position... - [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 21:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Besides I really don't think anyone here is eligible for a sysop position... - [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 21:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::What about me! [[User:Zmario|Zmario]] ([[User talk:Zmario|talk]]) 23:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ::::What about me! [[User:Zmario|Zmario]] ([[User talk:Zmario|talk]]) 23:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Just because you don't think anyone is currently eligible doesn't mean that we should discontinue the process. RFAs can fail if the candidate isn't ready. As for the number of sysops, it shouldn't matter how many we have if everyone uses their powers properly. You all need to realize that adminship is not a paid position. We do not "hire sysops". It is simply an extension of normal editing capacities that is given to contributors who have demonstrated to the community that they can use it properly. If we could trust every editor with adminship, that would be a good thing (although extremely unlikely due to the reality of the internet). However, RFA should be an ongoing community process. There is no need to limit the number of RFAs or sysops. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] ([[User talk:Dtm142|talk]]) 00:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||