SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 15:14, August 17, 2008
, 16 years ago→opening back up nominations?
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
WAIT A MINUTE! I want to speak my mind about sysops. I want to agree with every sysop who stated we dont need more sysops. I agree with that point to an extent. What happens when vandilism strikes and no sysop is on to get rid of it! By the time one gets on they could have vandilized the entire wikia. I am on most of the time anyways so how about letting me become a sysop? Im already a featured user. I have actually contributed more then Clarinet Hawk. I just want the tool of deletion and blocking/banning. Please consider this as I have been a reallt active user. [[User:Zmario|Zmario]] ([[User talk:Zmario|talk]]) 01:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | WAIT A MINUTE! I want to speak my mind about sysops. I want to agree with every sysop who stated we dont need more sysops. I agree with that point to an extent. What happens when vandilism strikes and no sysop is on to get rid of it! By the time one gets on they could have vandilized the entire wikia. I am on most of the time anyways so how about letting me become a sysop? Im already a featured user. I have actually contributed more then Clarinet Hawk. I just want the tool of deletion and blocking/banning. Please consider this as I have been a reallt active user. [[User:Zmario|Zmario]] ([[User talk:Zmario|talk]]) 01:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I agree with Zmario on vandalism. There could be no sysop to get rid of it, and for that reason more sysops would be useful. However, whether or not Zmario should be a sysop should be discussed on the main RFA page. Based on his inability to use the process properly, I probably wouldn't support. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] ([[User talk:Dtm142|talk]]) 01:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | :I agree with Zmario on vandalism. There could be no sysop to get rid of it, and for that reason more sysops would be useful. However, whether or not Zmario should be a sysop should be discussed on the main RFA page. Based on his inability to use the process properly, I probably wouldn't support. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] ([[User talk:Dtm142|talk]]) 01:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Well regular users can easily fix vandalism... and another easy solution would be rollback rights. So there isn't a real good reason to have new sysops. - [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 19:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | |||