3,883
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
:::::::Well I don't support it because I don't believe it's necessary. I believe it's a waste of resources, but if everyone ''really'' thinks bringing more people into the fold is the right thing to do, I won't argue. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 00:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | :::::::Well I don't support it because I don't believe it's necessary. I believe it's a waste of resources, but if everyone ''really'' thinks bringing more people into the fold is the right thing to do, I won't argue. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 00:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
OK, if everyone wants to know the real problem going on, here it is: Even the admins we currently have can't bother to talk to each other before making big decisions. Case in point is right here. With all due respect Dtm, you haven't been on this wiki very much lately, and the first thing you do after getting back is to overturn a policy that the sysops that were here decided on. Yes, we may have been hasty and incorrect in our decision (I can't really know), but it does very little for your credibility to jump in and overrule the other admins simply because you disagree. Now, the admins are in an edit war. That's not good. The biggest reason that I oppose any more admins is quite simply that we can't decide on what should be done now. Not that we need to always agree, I've disagreed with every one of you on different occasions, but we can't start undoing each other's edits back and forth just because we disagree. Do we really need to add more people into this mix? [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 00:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC) |
edits