Talk:Up throw Rest: Difference between revisions
MaskedMarth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This is a well-known technique among Jigglypuff players. No delete.--[[User:Nealdt|nealdt]] 12:50, November 20, 2007 (EST) | This is a well-known technique among Jigglypuff players. No delete.--[[User:Nealdt|nealdt]] 12:50, November 20, 2007 (EST) | ||
'''Delete''' - I've never heard this terminology before and I don't see how "up-throw to rest" doesn't just get mentioned offhandedly in the [[Jigglypuff (SSBM)|Jigglypuff]] article. Really, how much can you say about this tactic? Enough for an article? I doubt it. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 16:12, November 20, 2007 (EST) | <s>'''Delete''' - I've never heard this terminology before and I don't see how "up-throw to rest" doesn't just get mentioned offhandedly in the [[Jigglypuff (SSBM)|Jigglypuff]] article. Really, how much can you say about this tactic? Enough for an article? I doubt it. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 16:12, November 20, 2007 (EST)</s> | ||
:'''Keep''' - Changed my mind; MaskedMarth is right. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 13:49, January 13, 2008 (EST) | |||
:Hmmm... you're right. I've never heard of it before I found this article, but heck, it sounds as valid as the [[Wall of Pain]] to me. But what do I know? XD [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 16:33, November 20, 2007 (EST) | :Hmmm... you're right. I've never heard of it before I found this article, but heck, it sounds as valid as the [[Wall of Pain]] to me. But what do I know? XD [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 16:33, November 20, 2007 (EST) | ||
::MMMM maybe you said that because zinnamon say that it was wrong, and because he has been wrong before you thought you will be right if you say the opposite than him. I'm right? (Zinnamon, please, sing your post with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> --[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 16:49, November 20, 2007 (EST) | ::MMMM maybe you said that because zinnamon say that it was wrong, and because he has been wrong before you thought you will be right if you say the opposite than him. I'm right? (Zinnamon, please, sing your post with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> --[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 16:49, November 20, 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:49, January 13, 2008
Delete can some one confirm de validity of this technique??
- No Delete Can someone confirm the validity of the "Deathly Combo," "Z-Aerial," and "Z-Barrier?" I'm afraid that you can't delete real technique pages when your own are not correct. Teamrocketspy621 12:14, November 20, 2007 (EST)
This is a well-known technique among Jigglypuff players. No delete.--nealdt 12:50, November 20, 2007 (EST)
Delete - I've never heard this terminology before and I don't see how "up-throw to rest" doesn't just get mentioned offhandedly in the Jigglypuff article. Really, how much can you say about this tactic? Enough for an article? I doubt it. --RJM Talk 16:12, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- Keep - Changed my mind; MaskedMarth is right. --RJM Talk 13:49, January 13, 2008 (EST)
- Hmmm... you're right. I've never heard of it before I found this article, but heck, it sounds as valid as the Wall of Pain to me. But what do I know? XD Teamrocketspy621 16:33, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- MMMM maybe you said that because zinnamon say that it was wrong, and because he has been wrong before you thought you will be right if you say the opposite than him. I'm right? (Zinnamon, please, sing your post with four tildes ~~~~ --Fandangox 16:49, November 20, 2007 (EST)
No Delete I've seen the term used a lot on SWF and GFAQs, and it still works; DI just makes it slightly harder. Then again, what doesn't DI make harder? NeonCrusader 23:01, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --Fandangox 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- I changed my opinion because Zinnamon wanted to delete an article on what could be a valid tactic when his technique articles aren't exactly useful. Lightshielding, using Z for aerials, and One-hit KOs weren't exactly made/discovered/named by Zinnamon. However, Zinnamon and RJM may be right; the Space Animal Slayer might not exist. That is why I changed my opinion; because Randall > Me. Teamrocketspy621 15:18, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- That's exactly why I say before, only that I didn'y say it before.--Fandangox 16:21, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- I changed my opinion because Zinnamon wanted to delete an article on what could be a valid tactic when his technique articles aren't exactly useful. Lightshielding, using Z for aerials, and One-hit KOs weren't exactly made/discovered/named by Zinnamon. However, Zinnamon and RJM may be right; the Space Animal Slayer might not exist. That is why I changed my opinion; because Randall > Me. Teamrocketspy621 15:18, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --Fandangox 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST)
I say merge. Put it under Jigglypuff's techniques. Do the same with other articles of this type. --Oxico 15:34, December 13, 2007 (EST)
I agree. Merge. Who would look outside of Jigglypuff's moves for Jigglypuff's moves? Seriously.
No delete I think it's also worth mentioning that, unlike many other combos, this one has 1) a name, and 2) a big influence on the way people see Jiggly vs. Space Animal matchups. People still think Jiggly counters Fox and Falco because of the SAS! This is one of the best-known combos in the game and I believe it deserves even more coverage. – MaskedMarth (t c) 11:54, January 13, 2008 (EST)
