546
edits
User talk:Mexi: Difference between revisions
→Ganondorf page: Explaining more changes...
(→Ganondorf page: Explaining more changes...) |
|||
| Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
:My answer would be to check the attributes section for Ganondorf: there's a whole section talking about his poor reach, problematic hitboxes (including blind spots), and poor grab range. Those points have been written ages ago, so it's quite well known - the problem isn't really that his range isn't good, but the combination of everything else collectively just outweighs that range advantage. For example, neutral attack has pretty decent range, but it's slow, the hitbox lasts two frames, is only safe at the furthest hitbox, and you can crouch under it, so the range advantage isn't that great. It's the reason why he has a horrendous neutral game after all. Also, in the grand scheme of things, his range is also just merely okay for a melee fighter when ''Ultimate'' introduced a lot of fighters with much better effective range than he does. | :My answer would be to check the attributes section for Ganondorf: there's a whole section talking about his poor reach, problematic hitboxes (including blind spots), and poor grab range. Those points have been written ages ago, so it's quite well known - the problem isn't really that his range isn't good, but the combination of everything else collectively just outweighs that range advantage. For example, neutral attack has pretty decent range, but it's slow, the hitbox lasts two frames, is only safe at the furthest hitbox, and you can crouch under it, so the range advantage isn't that great. It's the reason why he has a horrendous neutral game after all. Also, in the grand scheme of things, his range is also just merely okay for a melee fighter when ''Ultimate'' introduced a lot of fighters with much better effective range than he does. | ||
:Instead of suggesting that his overall range is good, we could come into a compromise by adding that he does have some really good attacks that stand out for their range and hitboxes. Down tilt, neutral aerial and up aerial come to mind, and I have an idea on how to word it. [[User:Mexi|Mexi]] ([[User talk:Mexi#top|talk]]) 07:52, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | :Instead of suggesting that his overall range is good, we could come into a compromise by adding that he does have some really good attacks that stand out for their range and hitboxes. Down tilt, neutral aerial and up aerial come to mind, and I have an idea on how to word it. [[User:Mexi|Mexi]] ([[User talk:Mexi#top|talk]]) 07:52, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::I mean... I guess that follows. | |||
As for "taking an incredibly menacing advantage state", Having so many big strong moves makes for really nasty platform, ledge, and corner pressure, and nair is great for edgeguards. I felt like that positive was overlooked. | |||
"terribly slow movement and lack of any especially fast attack" instead of "terrible frame data": In terms of shield safety, startup, and end lag, a lot of his moves are a lot better than one might expect. The real problem is that he doesn't have a good "get off me" tool or combo breaker, so even his fast moves come up short against your typical frame 3-4 jab. [[User:Yo'ster|Yo'ster]] ([[User talk:Yo'ster|talk]]) 10:21, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | |||