7,069
edits
User talk:Mexi: Difference between revisions
→Ganondorf page
m (Almost forgot the signature!) |
|||
| Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
::I think what happens with me a lot is that I see some of that summary stuff that goes into some specifics but doesn't tell the full story and try to add more info, so then it sort of turns into an info-dump, when it'd probably be better to not list any details in the summary rather than only include like half of them. | ::I think what happens with me a lot is that I see some of that summary stuff that goes into some specifics but doesn't tell the full story and try to add more info, so then it sort of turns into an info-dump, when it'd probably be better to not list any details in the summary rather than only include like half of them. | ||
Okay. Now to address a more significant change: The addition of range as a selling point. You're telling me Ganon's range is bad? It's good though. The only move of his I can think of with bad range is grab. I guess back air's is bad for superheavy standards and overall unimpressive, but pretty much all of his aerials and tilts cover a good arc or distance. What's the thought process behind it being "one of his worst traits"? [[User:Yo'ster|Yo'ster]] ([[User talk:Yo'ster|talk]]) 07:34, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | Okay. Now to address a more significant change: The addition of range as a selling point. You're telling me Ganon's range is bad? It's good though. The only move of his I can think of with bad range is grab. I guess back air's is bad for superheavy standards and overall unimpressive, but pretty much all of his aerials and tilts cover a good arc or distance. What's the thought process behind it being "one of his worst traits"? [[User:Yo'ster|Yo'ster]] ([[User talk:Yo'ster|talk]]) 07:34, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:My answer would be to check the attributes section for Ganondorf: there's a whole section talking about his poor reach, problematic hitboxes (including blind spots), and poor grab range. Those points have been written ages ago, so it's quite well known - the problem isn't really that his range isn't good, but the combination of everything else collectively just outweighs that range advantage. For example, neutral attack has pretty decent range, but it's slow, the hitbox lasts two frames, is only safe at the furthest hitbox, and you can crouch under it, so the range advantage isn't that great. It's the reason why he has a horrendous neutral game after all. Also, in the grand scheme of things, his range is also just merely okay for a melee fighter when ''Ultimate'' introduced a lot of fighters with much better effective range than he does. | |||
:Instead of suggesting that his overall range is good, we could come into a compromise by adding that he does have some really good attacks that stand out for their range and hitboxes. Down tilt, neutral aerial and up aerial come to mind, and I have an idea on how to word it. [[User:Mexi|Mexi]] ([[User talk:Mexi#top|talk]]) 07:52, October 19, 2024 (EDT) | |||