Ice Climbers (SSBU)/Down tilt: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:PopoDTiltSSBU.gif|thumb|340px|Hitbox visualization showing Popo's down tilt.]] | [[File:PopoDTiltSSBU.gif|thumb|340px|Hitbox visualization showing Popo's down tilt.]] | ||
[[File:NanaDTiltSSBU.gif|thumb|340px|Hitbox visualization showing Nana's down tilt.]] | [[File:NanaDTiltSSBU.gif|thumb|340px|Hitbox visualization showing Nana's down tilt.]] | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Each of the duo performs an outward sweeping attack with their mallet. It sports quick startup, decent activity, and solid damage output. With moderate range, knockback, and ending lag to boot. While the move lacks combo potential and significant KO potency, it's fairly easy to poke shields with, and sends opponents diagonally downward, making it useful as a means of unexpectedly knocking the enemy offstage and setting up edgeguards. | |||
The move clips the [[ledge]] if positioned right, and its high speed, disjoint, and semi-spike launch angle make it a fairly safe and very dangerous two-framing option. What's more, the extra swing from the 2nd Climber works as a built-in 2nd try if the leader swings too early. | |||
Depending on how much the 2nd Climber's attack is delayed (via [[desynching]]) this can make the move much safer than it would be otherwise, and even gives it some use in setting up tech chases. But it doesn't seem to have much use in desyncs outside of that. | |||
Even with only one of the two, down tilt still serves as a passable poking and [[gimp]]ing tool, and a desirable move when used in a pair. | |||
==Hitboxes== | ==Hitboxes== | ||
{{UltimateHitboxTableHeader}} | {{UltimateHitboxTableHeader}} | ||
Line 17: | Line 24: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=3.0 | |r=3.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=-1.0 | |ypos=-1.0 | ||
Line 37: | Line 44: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=3.0 | |r=3.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=4.0 | |ypos=4.0 | ||
Line 57: | Line 64: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=4.0 | |r=4.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=8.0 | |ypos=8.0 | ||
Line 78: | Line 85: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=3.0 | |r=3.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=-1.0 | |ypos=-1.0 | ||
Line 98: | Line 105: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=3.0 | |r=3.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=4.0 | |ypos=4.0 | ||
Line 118: | Line 125: | ||
|fkv=0 | |fkv=0 | ||
|r=4.0 | |r=4.0 | ||
|bn= | |bn=havel | ||
|xpos=0.0 | |xpos=0.0 | ||
|ypos=8.0 | |ypos=8.0 | ||
Line 146: | Line 153: | ||
{{FrameIconLegend|lag=y|hitbox=y|interruptible=y}} | {{FrameIconLegend|lag=y|hitbox=y|interruptible=y}} | ||
==Trivia== | |||
*The move has a 40% trip chance that can only happen on slants due to the launch angle. | |||
{{MvSubNavIceClimbers|g=SSBU}} | {{MvSubNavIceClimbers|g=SSBU}} | ||
[[Category:Ice Climbers (SSBU)]] | [[Category:Ice Climbers (SSBU)]] | ||
[[Category:Down tilts (SSBU)]] | [[Category:Down tilts (SSBU)]] |
Latest revision as of 17:06, May 15, 2024
Overview[edit]
Each of the duo performs an outward sweeping attack with their mallet. It sports quick startup, decent activity, and solid damage output. With moderate range, knockback, and ending lag to boot. While the move lacks combo potential and significant KO potency, it's fairly easy to poke shields with, and sends opponents diagonally downward, making it useful as a means of unexpectedly knocking the enemy offstage and setting up edgeguards.
The move clips the ledge if positioned right, and its high speed, disjoint, and semi-spike launch angle make it a fairly safe and very dangerous two-framing option. What's more, the extra swing from the 2nd Climber works as a built-in 2nd try if the leader swings too early.
Depending on how much the 2nd Climber's attack is delayed (via desynching) this can make the move much safer than it would be otherwise, and even gives it some use in setting up tech chases. But it doesn't seem to have much use in desyncs outside of that.
Even with only one of the two, down tilt still serves as a passable poking and gimping tool, and a desirable move when used in a pair.
Hitboxes[edit]
Timing[edit]
Hitboxes | 8-11 |
---|---|
Interruptible | 31 |
Animation length | 34 |
Lag time |
Hitbox |
Interruptible |
Trivia[edit]
- The move has a 40% trip chance that can only happen on slants due to the launch angle.
|