Talk:One-hit KO: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can anyone come up with any more one-hit KOs? I could only think of those three. [[User:Tomm|Tomm]] 18:24, September 16, 2007 (EDT) | Can anyone come up with any more one-hit KOs? I could only think of those three. [[User:Tomm|Tomm]] 18:24, September 16, 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Technically, none of these are guaranteed KOs, because Flare Blade and Judgement 9 won't automatically KO someone if they've been used multiple times, and all of them can be negated by a well-placed wall or ceiling. In fact, those two scenarios make the "one-hit KO" description useless, because they're not guaranteed KO moves. [[User:WarxePB|WarxePB]] 20:48, September 16, 2007 (EDT) | :Technically, none of these are guaranteed KOs, because Flare Blade and Judgement 9 won't automatically KO someone if they've been used multiple times, and all of them can be negated by a well-placed wall or ceiling. In fact, those two scenarios make the "one-hit KO" description useless, because they're not guaranteed KO moves. [[User:WarxePB|WarxePB]] 20:48, September 16, 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Does the new(ish) definition fit it better? (And couldn't think of the name for the power degrading through overuse. >>) [[User:Tomm|Tomm]] 20:52, September 16, 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:52, September 16, 2007
Can anyone come up with any more one-hit KOs? I could only think of those three. Tomm 18:24, September 16, 2007 (EDT)
- Technically, none of these are guaranteed KOs, because Flare Blade and Judgement 9 won't automatically KO someone if they've been used multiple times, and all of them can be negated by a well-placed wall or ceiling. In fact, those two scenarios make the "one-hit KO" description useless, because they're not guaranteed KO moves. WarxePB 20:48, September 16, 2007 (EDT)
- Does the new(ish) definition fit it better? (And couldn't think of the name for the power degrading through overuse. >>) Tomm 20:52, September 16, 2007 (EDT)
