16,370
edits
Forum:Obsoletion policy: Difference between revisions
m
Removing red link to deleted page
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (Failing proposal) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (Removing red link to deleted page) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Proposal|failed|2=Only met with significant opposition and no support after a week, while no valid use case for this new template was provided. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 21:54, June 13, 2023 (EDT)}} | {{Proposal|failed|2=Only met with significant opposition and no support after a week, while no valid use case for this new template was provided. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 21:54, June 13, 2023 (EDT)}} | ||
Hi, I’m proposing a new policy regarding use of the {{t|Obsolete | Hi, I’m proposing a new policy regarding use of the {{t|Obsolete} template. What makes me propose this policy is that the conditions change depending on the namespace. Good obsoletion candidates include: | ||
*Pages or sections that include obsolete information (e.g. outdated information that could not be possibly updated). | *Pages or sections that include obsolete information (e.g. outdated information that could not be possibly updated). | ||
*Unused categories or templates that have been decided against deleting. These types of candidates must have explicit proof that they will never be used on the wiki. | *Unused categories or templates that have been decided against deleting. These types of candidates must have explicit proof that they will never be used on the wiki. | ||