SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Enigmatic Mr. L: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - ":Accepted Rollback" to ":Accepted rollback requests") Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Support''': Pikamander's famous rule.[[User:L33tSilvie|<span style="color:gold;">L33t</span>]] [[User talk:L33tSilvie|<span style="color:silver;">Silvie</span>]] <sup><span style="color:Green;">[[Special:Contributions/L33tSilvie|I see wat u did thar...</span></sup>]] | *'''Support''': Pikamander's famous rule.[[User:L33tSilvie|<span style="color:gold;">L33t</span>]] [[User talk:L33tSilvie|<span style="color:silver;">Silvie</span>]] <sup><span style="color:Green;">[[Special:Contributions/L33tSilvie|I see wat u did thar...</span></sup>]] | ||
[[Category:Accepted | [[Category:Accepted rollback requests]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:34, April 13, 2022
|
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Request passed
Enigmatic Mr. L[edit]
I'v been editing this wikia for about 3/4 of a year, so I do know some things about wikia tools. I am a very active contributor here (I contribute just about everyday as long as I can get to a working computer) who frequently patrols the recent changes (so I know when vandalism strikes). The number of my edits that were undoing vandalism exceeds 30. I am aware that because of Smashwiki:Assume good faith, I should only revert/undo edits when I'm positive they are vandalism. The best example of me explaining a revert that many wouldn't have bothered explaining is here [[1]]. As far as I know, these are the only qualifiactions for becoming a rollbacker (isn't a vandal, active, fights vandalsim, assumes good faith, etc. ), but correct me if I'm wrong. Enigmatic Mr. L 18:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Votes/Comments[edit]
- Support - I took a quick look at your contributions and as you said, you have a decent amount of reverts, which is good enough for me. Y462 (T • C • E ) 20:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support, not only is Mr. L aware of the problems of using rollback incorrectly (which most of the other users are not), he's very active and has reverted many times in the past. No reason not to pass. Shadowcrest 21:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support. EML is actively reverting vandalism, which is the main requirement here. Miles (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support: Pikamander's famous rule.L33t Silvie I see wat u did thar...
