SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Oppose: Editing formatting to allow for proper numbering votes.)
m (Text replacement - "a Bureaucrat" to "a bureaucrat")
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{shortcut|[[SW:RFB]]}}
{{shortcut|[[SW:RFB]]}}


This page is for requesting that one become a Bureaucrat on the Smash Wiki.
This page is for requesting that one become a bureaucrat on the Smash Wiki.


==Rules==
==Rules==
*Only persons that are already sysops may request a position as a bureaucrat.
*Only users that are already sysops may request a position as a bureaucrat.
*Only self-nominations are allowed.
*Only self-nominations are allowed.
*All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header (<nowiki>===Username===</nowiki>).  Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to become an Bureaucrat.  To prevent repetition of past information, all applicants should post a link to the archive of their [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship|RfA]].  Additionally, applicants should explain why they believe they should be a bureaucrat.
*All new nominees should post their name below in a level 3 header (<nowiki>===Username===</nowiki>).  Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to become a bureaucrat.  To prevent a repetition of past information, all applicants should post a link to the archive of their [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship|RfA]].  Additionally, applicants should explain why they believe they should be a bureaucrat.
*Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting bureaucrat.
*Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting bureaucrat.
*After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.
*After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.
Line 14: Line 14:
{{Special:Prefixindex/{{FULLPAGENAME}}/}}
{{Special:Prefixindex/{{FULLPAGENAME}}/}}


===[[User:Miles.oppenheimer|Miles.oppenheimer]]===
==Current Requests==
None


Hey everyone, it's Miles.  I've long planned to RfB, and there are a variety of reasons that I believe show my merits and would prove that I am worthy of becoming a bureaucrat of SmashWiki.
*'''Activity level.''' As Shadowcrest pointed out in [[SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Shadowcrest|his (successful) RfB]], "In terms of activity, I'd say I'm more active than every other admin except maybe Miles."  I'm on SmashWiki almost every day at least long enough to check my watchlist and deal with any pressing wiki issues.  Some days I work on more major edits or do random editing, and as such am on even longer.  If promoted, I'd be able to regularly check the status of other requests for promotions.
*'''Great record as a sysop.'''  Since becoming a sysop back in December, I've deleted spam pages and non-notable smasher articles, blocked vandals, made appropriate protections, managed disputes and helped new users.  I've also shown a good record with rollback powers since I acquired that ability previously.
*'''Long record of contributions to SmashWiki.'''  I recently became [[Special:Top/community|SmashWiki's top contributor]], and I'd like to think I got there on both quality and quantity.  I've also helped with the Smash Arena and the Featured Article systems at various points.  ([[SmashWiki:Featured content/Full|All of these snippets since #13 except one were written by yours truly.]])
*'''Objective viewpoint.''' I feel I would bring a clear mind and even disposition to the review of requests for promotion, being able to judge the consensus of the community and acting accordingly.
*I'd also like to point out that having three active bureaucrats (myself in addition to Clarinet Hawk and Shadowcrest) would create redundancy in the system, making sure there is always someone available to manage issues and requests for promotion.
*[[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer|My RfA]], [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|my contributions]], [[Special:Editcount/Miles.oppenheimer|my edit count.]]
Thank you for reading and, in advance, for commenting.  [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="khaki">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="khaki">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 23:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
====Support====
# '''YES''' It's about time. Every single last one of your contributions are positive. Plus you're such an amazing SysOp I thought you were already bcrat. lol [[User:Paper Bowser|Paper Bowser]] ([[User talk:Paper Bowser|talk]]) 00:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
[[Category:Administration]]
[[Category:Administration]]
====Oppose====
#Alright, here it is. You honestly haven't shown many Bureaucrat qualities, and you seem to want this position simply to speed up the "RF" processes, which there are very few of, and between Shadowcrest and Clarinet Hawk, they seem to be being taken care of. NOw as for each your points-
#*Activity-That doesn't do much, especially since Shadowcrest comes here every day too.
#*SySop Record-None of the things you mentioned had anything to do with bureaucratship-like traits, including judgement. You haven't really dealt with user bans, moreso vandal IPs and the such. You're user conflict record isn't extraneously amazing, and is not a major difference between Bcrat and SySop imo
#*Long record-Top contributor doesn't mean much, seeing as how it's edit count, not contributions or what namespace the edits are actually in. And as for FA's, that has nothing to do with bcrat.
#*Viewpoint-I can say things true, yet that would not make them true. You have not shown your ability to judge in the manner you have said.
#:And that's my stance.'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:#5F9EA0">Smoreking</span>]]<small><sup>[[User Talk:Smorekingxg456#Top|<span style="color:#00FF00">(T)</span>]]</sup></small><small><sub> [[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|(c)]]</sub></small>''' 00:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
====Neutral====
*....
====Comments====
*...

Latest revision as of 00:45, April 13, 2022

Policy.png This page documents an official SmashWiki policy, a widely accepted standard that all users should follow. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. If in doubt, consider discussing changes on the talk page.
Shortcut:
SW:RFB

This page is for requesting that one become a bureaucrat on the Smash Wiki.

Rules

  • Only users that are already sysops may request a position as a bureaucrat.
  • Only self-nominations are allowed.
  • All new nominees should post their name below in a level 3 header (===Username===). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to become a bureaucrat. To prevent a repetition of past information, all applicants should post a link to the archive of their RfA. Additionally, applicants should explain why they believe they should be a bureaucrat.
  • Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting bureaucrat.
  • After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

Current Requests

None

Retrieved from "https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=SmashWiki:Requests_for_bureaucratship&oldid=1676543"