Tournament talk:Glitch 4: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (:\) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==On Tweek's Bowser Jr. and Cosmos's Dr. Mario== | ==On Tweek's Bowser Jr. and Cosmos's Dr. Mario== | ||
I don't understand your choice to add them. They only played those characters once, most likely for sandbagging. Why would you count it? | I don't understand your choice to add them. They only played those characters once, most likely for sandbagging. Why would you count it? <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:SugarCookie420|SugarCookie420]] ([[User talk:SugarCookie420|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SugarCookie420|contribs]]) 12:24, April 29, 2018</small> | ||
:I'm generally okay with removing "sandbagging characters" from R1 pools and such, but I think main bracket matches should at the very least be devoid of removing characters that won a set (regardless of the circumstances). For doubles in particular, they won with those characters in Grand Finals regardless of sandbagging (from both sides, admittedly), so I really see no reason to remove them. Tweek technically won a full set with Jr. as well. [[User:PokemonMasterJamal3|PokemonMasterJamal3]] ([[User talk:PokemonMasterJamal3|talk]]) 12:33, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | :I'm generally okay with removing "sandbagging characters" from R1 pools and such, but I think main bracket matches should at the very least be devoid of removing characters that won a set (regardless of the circumstances). For doubles in particular, they won with those characters in Grand Finals regardless of sandbagging (from both sides, admittedly), so I really see no reason to remove them. Tweek technically won a full set with Jr. as well. [[User:PokemonMasterJamal3|PokemonMasterJamal3]] ([[User talk:PokemonMasterJamal3|talk]]) 12:33, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
:I think we can be more liberal with including characters in Smash 4 (where mid/low tiers are much more common and often have legitimate uses, such as WaDi's ROB which I can confirm he used to win in pools) than in Melee.[[User:Antimony|Antimony]] ([[User talk:Antimony|talk]]) 1:00, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | :I think we can be more liberal with including characters in Smash 4 (where mid/low tiers are much more common and often have legitimate uses, such as WaDi's ROB which I can confirm he used to win in pools) than in Melee.[[User:Antimony|Antimony]] ([[User talk:Antimony|talk]]) 1:00, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
Ok, I get it now. Sorry for being stupid. [[User:SugarCookie420|SugarCookie420]] ([[User talk:SugarCookie420|talk]]) 16:59, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | Ok, I get it now. Sorry for being stupid. [[User:SugarCookie420|SugarCookie420]] ([[User talk:SugarCookie420|talk]]) 16:59, 29 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:01, September 27, 2021
On Tweek's Bowser Jr. and Cosmos's Dr. Mario[edit]
I don't understand your choice to add them. They only played those characters once, most likely for sandbagging. Why would you count it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SugarCookie420 (talk • contribs) 12:24, April 29, 2018
- I'm generally okay with removing "sandbagging characters" from R1 pools and such, but I think main bracket matches should at the very least be devoid of removing characters that won a set (regardless of the circumstances). For doubles in particular, they won with those characters in Grand Finals regardless of sandbagging (from both sides, admittedly), so I really see no reason to remove them. Tweek technically won a full set with Jr. as well. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 12:33, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
- I think we can be more liberal with including characters in Smash 4 (where mid/low tiers are much more common and often have legitimate uses, such as WaDi's ROB which I can confirm he used to win in pools) than in Melee.Antimony (talk) 1:00, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
Ok, I get it now. Sorry for being stupid. SugarCookie420 (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
