Forum:Articles on games...: Difference between revisions

Forum:Articles on games... (edit)

Revision as of 23:59, August 21, 2010

1 byte added , 14 years ago

m

moving to the correct place

Clarinet Hawk

3,883

edits

Revision as of 21:39, August 21, 2010 (edit) Mr. Anon (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:59, August 21, 2010 (edit) (undo) Clarinet Hawk (talk \| contribs) m (moving to the correct place) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Forumheader\|~~Brawl Talk~~}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->		{{Forumheader\|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->

	It's come to my attention that we have articles on games that have been lingering here for a while and need to be eliminated. Examples: [[Super Mario 64]], [[Super Mario Sunshine]], [[Star Fox: Assault]]. To be honest, these articles, in terms of giving information, are useless. If a character has a move that comes from a game, then that's what should be mentioned in said character's article. If a character appears in Brawl or Melee as a trophy, then the article is thus useless and should not have ever existed. We've been over this with trophy articles (surprisingly, some of them are still here).		It's come to my attention that we have articles on games that have been lingering here for a while and need to be eliminated. Examples: [[Super Mario 64]], [[Super Mario Sunshine]], [[Star Fox: Assault]]. To be honest, these articles, in terms of giving information, are useless. If a character has a move that comes from a game, then that's what should be mentioned in said character's article. If a character appears in Brawl or Melee as a trophy, then the article is thus useless and should not have ever existed. We've been over this with trophy articles (surprisingly, some of them are still here).