Talk:King Bulblin & Lord Bullbo: Difference between revisions
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (Serpent King moved page Talk:Bulblin to Talk:King Bulblin & Lord Bullbo without leaving a redirect: Merged with King Bulblin & Lord Bullbo) |
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (that's a little better) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion (of Bulblin article before merge)== | ||
Oppose | Oppose | ||
Latest revision as of 00:14, April 6, 2021
Deletion (of Bulblin article before merge)[edit]
Oppose
While yes it’s a small thing, it’s still a hazard that in my opinion is worthy of a article. RobbyB3ll4s (talk)}
Merge with King Bulblin & Lord Bullbo These fill the same role as hazards on Eldin Bridge. Serpent 
King 08:29, March 15, 2021 (EDT)
Oppose because it's still a hazard that can be interacted with 
Thegameandwatch 
The Nerd 15:54, March 16, 2021 (EDT)
I agree with SK on merge with the King Bulbin article; they're a part of the same set piece on the same stage, and Bulbin has no other role except for as a trophy in Brawl. Hell most of this article is just the origin section and the copy paste of its trophy description, while there's no real prospects for relevant expansion. Omega Tyrant 
16:16, March 16, 2021 (EDT)
Weren't they demerged at one point or am I thinking of a different page? Wolff (talk) 14:39, March 18, 2021 (EDT)
Oppose. The fact that they can be stunned via attacking means they aren't on the same level as other simple background characters, and thus deserve a page. At the very least, this page could be merged with King Bulblin and not outright deleted. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer (talk) 20:31, March 22, 2021 (EDT)
