Talk:Leffen vs. Chillin (Apex 2015)

Merge

Honestly, I think this page should just be about "Respect Your Elders," which is one of the reasons why the set became infamous; most of the information here is the leadup and effect of the diss track. All the stuff on the exhibition set is already covered in their respective pages, so any additional information should be merged to Apex 2015 or their respective Smasher pages. CookiesCreme 11:38, December 6, 2020 (EST)

I would be okay with that approach, though I still think that the set overall plus the drama surrounding it is notable enough to deserve its own article.

Overall I would like to challenge the merge reason saying that single tournament sets are not notable enough to deserve their own articles. The diss track has over 1.5 million views, and the full set has almost 900k views (the most viewed in Melee history), which is pretty remarkable considering how small competitive Smash is. Not to mention the set + the diss track have spawned tons of highlight compilations, memes, and remixes, which is unprecedented for a Smash competitive set. Plus all the attention that the set has received from non-Smash related media. 1 2 3 Look on any reddit thread and there are so many people saying that this is one of their favorite/most iconic sets of all time. 1 2 3

In a fighting game where history is decided by individual matches, I see no reason why an individual match can't be considered notable enough to merit its own article. Wikipedia has plenty of articles about the most famous sporting matches. 1 2 3. A Smash-specific wiki should be willing to write about these historical moments. Plus the Wombo Combo article already exists, and that's just 30 seconds of a set, so there should be no question that an entire set has the potential to be notable enough.

Also, I don't think this article fits the traditional usage of a merge. SmashWiki typically merges articles when the split-offs are extremely short articles with little to no relevant encyclopedic content. That's why we have articles for "Lists of trophies" instead of have separate pages for every minor Nintendo character that would take up only a few lines.

If this article was a few sentences long while trying to squeeze out information, I think the merge argument would apply here. But this is not the case here. The article is 16 KB long, halfway to the old 32 KB mobile limit, and is longer than most non-top 50 smasher articles. It has a well structured table of contents with clearly defined sections. I spent most of the article talking about the background and aftermath, and barely any time talking about the technical details of the set itself. It has 39 references, which is more than our article on Ultimate.

The article Leffen vs Chillin fits the exact purpose of what a wiki is meant to do. If an article has a subtopic that has enough information to stand on its own, you split the page in two, while using a "Main Article" link on the former page. Merging the two pages would inevitably remove some of the relevant content on this article, which is not the purpose of an encyclopedia.

I know that this is the first article of its kind on SmashWiki, but I think it would be more productive to consider writing articles about other famous tournament sets, rather than trying to delete one because "none others exist yet" (SmashWiki is not complete anyways). Of course this could open up a path where short stubs of matches get randomly created, but I think based on that it should be clear if a set has enough content to deserve a standalone page (plus there are probably only a handful of sets that deserve their own article). Awesome Cardinal 2000 16:33, December 6, 2020 (EST)

This comment isn't about the merge but more about articles like this in the future. This set is notable in that it was the result of beef between two top players and also has a lasting legacy; the same can be said about the Wombo Combo. However, what's the difference between a "notable" set and a "memorable" set? For example, is Nairo v. ZeRo at MLG 2015 considered notable? On one hand, it's the first time ZeRo lost a tournament in Smash 4, but on the other hand it was just that. There wasn't much that built up to it, there's not much legacy, heck this set is probably taboo now because of the recent allegations. But because of that one thing it's considered one of Smash 4's most important sets. Should it get a page? In my opinion, there should be a clear line between the two before creating more pages like this. CookiesCreme 17:02, December 6, 2020 (EST)

There's nothing inherently wrong with mentions of iconic/notable/memorable sets (Unknown522 vs Mew2King at RoM5 and CaptainZack vs Lima at EVO 2018, both of which are already mentioned on-wiki, come to mind); I just think that there's less incentive to make full pages out of these. Aidan, the Festive Rurouni 17:17, December 6, 2020 (EST)

I think it would be better on a case-by-case basis. Obviously anyone can make an article about any set they want, but if you can't describe it in more than a few sentences, it probably should be merged. Deleting/merging short stubs is normally not great, but for these kinds of articles I think it's okay to merge low-effort pages that worsen the quality of the site (similar to how we don't approve of those "'XXXX' is a smasher from Y state" articles).

I think the best policy for now would be to keep memorable sets in the tournament/smasher article, until someone writes a substantial enough article on them, after which they could be split into their own page. Writing about tournament stories (beyond just placings and data points) is something I've always wanted to do more of anyways, and back when I was more active, I added tournament summaries to many articles like here at SKTAR 3 and Get On My Level 2016. Awesome Cardinal 2000 18:32, December 6, 2020 (EST)