Smasher talk:IntroSpecktive: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Deletion) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::I feel as though many people forget that the notability guideline specifically says that notability is defined "''for the purposes of this Wiki, as any article pertaining to the '''competitive''' community of the Super Smash Bros. series''". IntroSpecktive's content creation and contributions to the community have nothing to do with the competitive scene which is what the wiki documents. As per current guidelines the subject in question is not notable. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:11, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | :::I feel as though many people forget that the notability guideline specifically says that notability is defined "''for the purposes of this Wiki, as any article pertaining to the '''competitive''' community of the Super Smash Bros. series''". IntroSpecktive's content creation and contributions to the community have nothing to do with the competitive scene which is what the wiki documents. As per current guidelines the subject in question is not notable. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:11, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:'''Neutral'''. I don't see a reason to not include popular ''Smash'' YouTubers without a competitive presence, but at the same time Smasher pages are for competitive players, not content creators. Also, I don't want to go down the rabbit hole on defining what a "notable" content creator is, especially since the ones with a lot of subscribers such as {{Sm|Alpharad}}, {{Sm|Shofu}}, and {{Sm|Little Z}} have participated in legitimate tournaments | :'''Neutral'''. I don't see a reason to not include popular ''Smash'' YouTubers without a competitive presence, but at the same time Smasher pages are for competitive players, not content creators. Also, I don't want to go down the rabbit hole on defining what a "notable" content creator is, especially since the ones with a lot of subscribers such as {{Sm|Alpharad}}, {{Sm|Shofu}}, and {{Sm|Little Z}} have participated in legitimate tournaments and a subscriber threshold isn't really a good idea for notability. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 15:25, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:27, July 22, 2020
Deletion
Gonna have to say this but this page has to go, I fully support this deletion. 
S3AHAWK (talk)
20:50, July 12, 2020 (EDT)
- Support as well, this article was deleted before and will be deleted again for the exact same reason.
NPM Morr!? 
21:26, July 12, 2020 (EDT) - Support Player has no relevance to the competitive scene. Page needs to go. Señor Mexicano (talk) 00:31, July 15, 2020 (EDT)
- Support: Try creating a smasher article that has actual tournament results. A popular Youtube channel is insufficient warrant a page. MemeDedede (talk) 09:40, July 16, 2020 (EDT)
- Bump
S3AHAWK (talk)
00:46, July 22, 2020 (EDT)
- The new notability policy seems to completely contradict the arguments made here. He's definitely been "contributing to the growth of the community" through his YouTube channel, and he is certainly a "content creator". I don't get the arguments here given this. Heavy oppose. --
Plague von Karma 11:02, July 22, 2020 (EDT)
- I feel as though many people forget that the notability guideline specifically says that notability is defined "for the purposes of this Wiki, as any article pertaining to the competitive community of the Super Smash Bros. series". IntroSpecktive's content creation and contributions to the community have nothing to do with the competitive scene which is what the wiki documents. As per current guidelines the subject in question is not notable. Señor Mexicano (talk) 15:11, July 22, 2020 (EDT)
- The new notability policy seems to completely contradict the arguments made here. He's definitely been "contributing to the growth of the community" through his YouTube channel, and he is certainly a "content creator". I don't get the arguments here given this. Heavy oppose. --
- Neutral. I don't see a reason to not include popular Smash YouTubers without a competitive presence, but at the same time Smasher pages are for competitive players, not content creators. Also, I don't want to go down the rabbit hole on defining what a "notable" content creator is, especially since the ones with a lot of subscribers such as Alpharad, Shofu, and Little Z have participated in legitimate tournaments and a subscriber threshold isn't really a good idea for notability. Cookies
Creme 15:25, July 22, 2020 (EDT)
