User talk:Vittorio Fedele

A couple of things

Hi. There are a couple of things I would like to discuss with you.

1. Your constant back and forth with supatoad, including accusing him of bad faith and of attacking you when they clearly are not, qualifies as harassment. It stops now.
2. You are not to threaten other users with admin action, ever. If you have a problem with something another user is doing, go to an admin.
3. I'd like to remind you that this wiki does not contain subjective content. I have gotten numerous complaints about you adding subjective, non-verifiable claims on our character pages

Please immediately cease all three of these. This is an official admin warning. Thanks and have a great day! SerpentKing 12:06, February 11, 2020 (EST)

Sorry about that. It's just that i cannot even explain myself. Besides, i'm a subsceptible guy, and i thought that he was attacking me because of my opinion. The truth is that i'm very serious when telling something, and i don't want to be bashed only because i tell something. Do you have any idea of how much is unnerving that anyone won't let me say what i think of something? Just because i joined recently doesn't mean i have to receive such a treatment. I also have thought that no one understood what i really meant to say and that everyone take a few parts of an edit a bit too seriously. Do you understand what i mean? Vittorio Fedele (talk) 12:34, February 11, 2020 (EST)

Hello? Are you listening to what i said? Come on, answer me.Vittorio Fedele (talk) 13:45, February 11, 2020 (EST)

There is such a think as being away from keys. Do not expect an immediate answer at all times. Anyway, edits are meant to be taken seriously. If you have something that isn't meant to be taken serious, don't hit the submit button. No one is treating you unfairly that I have seen. If you think otherwise, link me to those edits. This wiki is not for subjectivity: claims on this wiki have to be backed up by actual facts. If you want to talk subjectively about stuff, there are other outlets, such as our discord server. SerpentKing 13:51, February 11, 2020 (EST)

Ok, it's just that Omegatoad64 didn't liked the fact that i wanted Pikachu to be nerfed, but i had my reasons for it. And about Kirby, in his page, i put a couple of times that due to the changes to his moveset, his KO potential has improved, but even that got removed. Not the entirety of the edit has to be removed. Besides i noticed that in this Discord server, i have to make an account with my email address. I already made an account on an Italian Wiki of Super Mario, since i'm Italian, but like this i can't discuss in this server. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vittorio Fedele (talk • contribs) 14:13, February 11, 2020

"didn't liked the fact that i wanted Pikachu to be nerfed, but i had my reasons for it"

Regardless of your reasons or the fact that Pikachu is one of the best characters in the game, opinions don't belong in wiki articles, period. The only exception we make is for notable top players, which is already done by mentioning that ZeRo considers Pikachu to be broken; top players have much more experience and knowledge of the game to properly support their opinion.

"i put a couple of times that due to the changes to his moveset, his KO potential has improved, but even that got removed"

Okay, you have a point here, but this isn't the only thing you've been adding to the page. You also keep tampering with the wording and structure to make it seem like Kirby is significantly better than in previous games, when that's not the case. Even if the information itself is true, this is a misinterpretation that doesn't belong, and regardless of whether or not your intention is to make Kirby look better than he actually is, you should stop trying to repeatedly change how the page is structured, when that job has been already done in a more neutral way by more knowledgeable contributors. DracoRex, Creator of the Land 14:41, February 11, 2020 (EST)