SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
(→Failed) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
::I understand what you mean. I can't provide another three at this time, so feel free to close this. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 04:41, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | ::I understand what you mean. I can't provide another three at this time, so feel free to close this. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 04:41, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:''Result:'' {{indeterminate|16}}{{indeterminate|16}}{{indeterminate|16}} '''Failed'''. Given examples are too borderline to show understanding of the rollback tool. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Obfuscating 08:29, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | :''Result:'' {{indeterminate|16}}{{indeterminate|16}}{{indeterminate|16}} '''Failed'''. Given examples are too borderline to show understanding of the rollback tool. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Obfuscating 08:29, July 6, 2019 (EDT) | ||
===Jaydyn=== | |||
*[https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Smasher:Crush&diff=prev&oldid=1256128 #1] | |||
*[https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Smasher:Ludwig&diff=prev&oldid=1261926 #2] and [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Smasher:Ludwig&diff=next&oldid=1261926 #2 continued] Included 2 links because I edited the page on the assumption it was a good faith edit, before later noticing the obvious vandalism. The 2nd link is the one where I remove the vandalism. | |||
*[https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Smasher:Mango&diff=prev&oldid=1238549#Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl #3] | |||
([[Special:Contributions/YourUsername|contributions]]) [[User:Jaydyn|Jaydyn]] ([[User talk:Jaydyn|talk]]) 04:59, July 14, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:''Result:'' {{n|16}}{{n|16}}{{n|16}} '''Failed'''. All these edits, aside from a part of 2.5, require some thought and context to identify as vandalism - they are not the blatant and unquestionable offenses rollback is about. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The SMASH-GINEER 06:40, July 17, 2019 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:40, July 17, 2019
This is an archive of rollback requests in chronological order.
Passed
BSTIK (2)
So it's been a month since my m̶y̶ ̶c̶o̶m̶p̶l̶e̶t̶e̶ ̶f̶a̶i̶l̶u̶r̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶a̶ ̶r̶e̶q̶u̶e̶s̶t̶. I'm hoping this request irons out the issues that were present last time.
No. 3,4 and 5 all count under 3 however they could have all been reverted at once if i had rollback (contributions) BSTIK (talk) 05:48, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
- Result: Passed #1 and #2 were probably the same guy in the same timeframe but I think they're different enough to count separately. Toomai Glittershine The Emissary 06:33, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
Alex Parpotta
(contributions) Alex Parpotta (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- Result: Passed #1 is meh in a vacuum but a look at history shows the user already made a mess on the same page, so it's good. Toomai Glittershine The Irrepressible 20:48, 2 July 2017 (EDT)
RobSir_zx (2)
(contributions) RobSir zx 03:37, 20 July 2017 (EDT)
- Result: Passed While the usage of edit summaries helps for these reverts, if someone were to have used rollback it wouldn't have been a problem. Toomai Glittershine The Resolute 06:28, 20 July 2017 (EDT)
Awesomelink234 (2)
(contributions) Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 13:18, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
If I may add something, there were several edits by another vandal I just did that could've been done with rollback. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 13:27, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
- You need to have examples from more than just one user. All 3 of these are valid but because they are all from the same user, I can't pass this. Serpent King 14:14, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
- Fixed up a bit, and also included some vandalism I reverted long ago. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 14:18, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
- Result: Passed Serpent King 14:24, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
SugarCookie420
First time trying for rollback, I hope it works.
- #1 - Memoryman coming back.
- #2 - There were edits in between, although that was before I realized what was going on.
- #3 - Self-explanatory.
- #4 - Obvious vandalism, especially since he cleared parts of the page after this.
(contributions) SugarCookie420 (talk) 22:04, 20 January 2019 (EST)
I added a fourth one because I felt like number 2 may be questionable. SugarCookie420 (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2019 (EST)
- Also, I won't be online until the next day, so please don't fail me if I don't respond. SugarCookie420 (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2019 (EST)
- Your first link isn't vandalism per say, but given the user's checkered past, I'll accept it. Your second example is not a valid use of rollback because it requires an edit summary, and I would also be willing to assume good faith. It's very possible that the edit was just a mistake (could be a different tournament, but ended up editing the wrong article). That said I am passing this.
- Result: Passed Serpent King 22:54, 20 January 2019 (EST)
DracoRexKing
(contributions) DracoRex, Creator of the Land 18:34, March 12, 2019 (EDT)
- Your first example isn't really vandalism, it could easily just be a good faith user with a not-reliable source, or their own fan name. Either way, a revert is good, rollback would be questionable. That said...
- Result: Passed Serpent King 22:54, 20 January 2019 (EST)
NaughtyPigMario
(contributions) Naughty🐽GRAND DAD 自閉肥宅 04:52, March 13, 2019 (EDT)
Xtra3678
(contributions) XtraTalk Edits 11:48, April 10, 2019 (EDT)
Failed
Lv20ninja
- #1 User is new and I'm tired of having to click through all of his edits after reviews. He had an issue earlier of providing a tier list edit with no notes provided. I have a suspicion that he will continue to do this and I want to maintain the integrity of previous edits made.
- #2 I remember there was an incident regarding IP changes based on whoever thinks is personally rated as "Professional" that started a debate that needed quite a few undoing. As well as the best in the "world" vs "America" should've been compressed as another incident on the smasher page.
- #3 I believe this incident could've been reverted after a lot of vandalism and personal attack occurred during these edits.
(contributions) Lv20ninja (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2018 (EST)
- I was wondering. What were some of the edits you were going to pointed out for #1 and #3? MHStarCraft 11:20, 30 January 2018 (EST)
- While he's not suppose to comment on these, Starcraft is right, I need something more specific for #1 and #3. Also please note that you have to be the one who did the revert, not someone else, which makes your #2 example invalid. Serpent King 12:20, 30 January 2018 (EST)
- Ah I guess for now I'll have to find something more substantial to support my claims in the future. For now I'll take the penalty and defer my request for rollback til I find something more concrete. Thank you for your time. Lv20ninja (talk) 02:12, 31 January 2018 (EST)
- Result: Failed #1 and #3 were nonspecific examples, and #2 was not performed by the user Serpent King 10:46, 31 January 2018 (EST)
Lou Cena
(header supplemented)
#1
(contributions) Lou Cena (talk) 02:13, July 4, 2019 (EDT)
Serena Strawberry
(contributions) ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 16:46, July 4, 2019 (EDT)
- These are borderline at best. Provide another 3 that are more in the spirit of clear, unquestionable uses of rollback. Toomai Glittershine The Victorious 07:59, July 5, 2019 (EDT)
- I understand what you mean. I can't provide another three at this time, so feel free to close this. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 04:41, July 6, 2019 (EDT)
- Result: Failed. Given examples are too borderline to show understanding of the rollback tool. Toomai Glittershine The Obfuscating 08:29, July 6, 2019 (EDT)
Jaydyn
- #1
- #2 and #2 continued Included 2 links because I edited the page on the assumption it was a good faith edit, before later noticing the obvious vandalism. The 2nd link is the one where I remove the vandalism.
- #3
(contributions) Jaydyn (talk) 04:59, July 14, 2019 (EDT)
- Result: Failed. All these edits, aside from a part of 2.5, require some thought and context to identify as vandalism - they are not the blatant and unquestionable offenses rollback is about. Toomai Glittershine The SMASH-GINEER 06:40, July 17, 2019 (EDT)