2,594
edits
Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
→Splitting all shared special moves
Capstalker (talk | contribs) |
Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::I really want to understand why you believe separating moves with the same name and making over 80 pages on the Wiki is a good idea and makes thing easier and more manageable. I am having a very difficult time understanding how practical or beneficial a decision like that would be to the Wiki as a whole. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 22:31, May 15, 2019 (EDT) | :::I really want to understand why you believe separating moves with the same name and making over 80 pages on the Wiki is a good idea and makes thing easier and more manageable. I am having a very difficult time understanding how practical or beneficial a decision like that would be to the Wiki as a whole. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 22:31, May 15, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::If we decide the question in terms of practicality, I think can compare pages rate of repetition and set a value to decide whether to split, just like the way we distinguish clones.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:43, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ::::If we decide the question in terms of practicality, I think can compare pages rate of repetition and set a value to decide whether to split, just like the way we distinguish clones.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:43, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} | ||