User talk:Black Vulpine/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
→Triva: Sorry if you perceive me as rude. That is NOT my intent.
m (Bolding and enlarging header on notebox.) |
(→Triva: Sorry if you perceive me as rude. That is NOT my intent.) |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
:First off, please remember to sign your comments (four tildes at the end, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) | :First off, please remember to sign your comments (four tildes at the end, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) | ||
:Second, I'm glad you agree with me on some of the trivia points. I admittedly have a pretty strict definition for what qualifies as good trivia, but as for determining what is interesting or not, if it doesn't make me go, "Wow, really?" then it's probably not very interesting. Now, of course, that subjective qualification is unhelpful for you, and what is truly considered to be interesting will ultimately be determined by the collective opinion of the wiki's members. But as the policy says, you should avoid anything that is not very original or is likely to be common knowledge. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 11:48, 27 June 2018 (EDT) | :Second, I'm glad you agree with me on some of the trivia points. I admittedly have a pretty strict definition for what qualifies as good trivia, but as for determining what is interesting or not, if it doesn't make me go, "Wow, really?" then it's probably not very interesting. Now, of course, that subjective qualification is unhelpful for you, and what is truly considered to be interesting will ultimately be determined by the collective opinion of the wiki's members. But as the policy says, you should avoid anything that is not very original or is likely to be common knowledge. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 11:48, 27 June 2018 (EDT) | ||
Hello again. I'll admit that Duck Hunt and ROB probably did not need the info, but I think Ivysaur ''should'' have it. Ivysaur ''is'' the ''first'' '''quadrupedal''' (walks on four legs) fighter. Usually from what I've see from interviews or sourced material on other Wikis, developers say making a quadrupedal fighter can be more difficult for game play in comparison to a bipedal (walks on two legs) fighter like a human or a quadrupedal ''enemy''. Yes, one could argue that it is irrelevant information since both Pikachu and Pichu can walk on all four, but they are considered bipedal since they can switch between. But quadrupeds can't switch between, and handstands don't count towards being bipedal. I also made sure to check the other fighters from ''64'', ''Melee'', and ''Brawl'' before I made the change about Ivysaur. Also, both Red XIII from ''Final Fantasy VII'' and Repede from ''Tales of Vesperia'' had difficultly implementing the quadrupedal characters whether it was game play or story wise. Also on ''their'' wikis, they mention that they are the first "quadrupedal" or "four-legged" playable character of their series. That said, are you sure it is too ''irrelevant'' to be added? I do respect your opinion since you know more when it comes to editing the ''Smash Wiki''. | |||
[[User:47.199.44.226|47.199.44.226]] ([[User talk:47.199.44.226|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/47.199.44.226|contribs]]) 06:09, 13 July 2018 (EDT)</small> | |||
== Another troller == | == Another troller == | ||