Forum:Fan games?: Difference between revisions
UltraNessDX (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(Reverting: Do not post on old discussions.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:We don't need ANY FANON. I agree with you. SSF is nice, but there are much more fanon that are better and why don't we let those ones in? There is this [http://www.yoyogames.com/games/show/43778 game], and basically, it's '''currently''' way better than SSF or SSF2. (in my defense, im stating to delete all fan games, not delete ssf and replace it with the one i mentioned) --[[User:Pokeflora|Pokeflora]] ([[User talk:Pokeflora|talk]]) 22:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | :We don't need ANY FANON. I agree with you. SSF is nice, but there are much more fanon that are better and why don't we let those ones in? There is this [http://www.yoyogames.com/games/show/43778 game], and basically, it's '''currently''' way better than SSF or SSF2. (in my defense, im stating to delete all fan games, not delete ssf and replace it with the one i mentioned) --[[User:Pokeflora|Pokeflora]] ([[User talk:Pokeflora|talk]]) 22:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Fanon == | == Fanon == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:07, April 23, 2018
Okay, so articles for fan games are getting out of hand. We let one in, apparently we have to let them all in. I think we should remove fan game articles completely. If I can recall correctly, there was a wikia made specifically for SSB fan games. Shouldn't we move all of them over there and keep this wikia for canon games? Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • C ) 00:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
You know, I once supported fan games staying, but you're right. The situation's gotten way out of hand. If there's really a wiki for SSB fan games, I say we move all of them there. - GalaxiaD Talk 00:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- I added delete tags. Time to wait for it to hit the fan. Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • C ) 12:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think Super Smash Flash should be kept, but the rest, yeah, it's getting far too much. And even SSF should be
- shorted down a little. IT'S A METEORITE!If you weren't crushed 15:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- See the thing is is that if we let one slide, we have let them all slide. Plus, none of them are relevant to Brawl. The Fanon website would be the best spot for them. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Okay, all fan games save SSF are gone. Super Smash Flash has been chopped down to a short and sweet informative article, not a strategy guide. This page may even be removed entirely, as I see there's a wiki dedicated solely to it. Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • C ) 07:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
With uh... Absolutely no disrespect to Meteorite, I have no idea why one persons say (one person I haven't seen in forever) has the effect on a fanon policy. I really think the same thing is gonna happen, where games keep getting added. Just take them all down. Kperfekt722 These Rules Are Stupid 23:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- We don't need ANY FANON. I agree with you. SSF is nice, but there are much more fanon that are better and why don't we let those ones in? There is this game, and basically, it's currently way better than SSF or SSF2. (in my defense, im stating to delete all fan games, not delete ssf and replace it with the one i mentioned) --Pokeflora (talk) 22:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Fanon[edit]
Why not just merge all fandom articles into one? That includes SSF, Smashtasm, whatever we can find here that's fandom. Of course, anything besides those listed above should probably be deleted...Silvie (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
2 things: That's a great idea, and I thought that you were the guy that got a perma-ban for some really personal PA's? Kperfekt722 These Rules Are Stupid 00:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
How is that relevant? GutripperSpeak
Wouldn't it be weird if you saw someone who you thought was like... idk zinnamon? Kperfekt BURN!!! Revert That! 01:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
