Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 73: |
Line 73: |
|
| |
|
| Oh! Okay I thought so too. I just wanted to confirm. Thanks! [[User:RaichuPichuKing|RaichuPichuKing]] ([[User talk:RaichuPichuKing|talk]]) 23:40, 19 June 2018 (EDT) | | Oh! Okay I thought so too. I just wanted to confirm. Thanks! [[User:RaichuPichuKing|RaichuPichuKing]] ([[User talk:RaichuPichuKing|talk]]) 23:40, 19 June 2018 (EDT) |
|
| |
| == Images ==
| |
|
| |
| Hey, listen, it's already kinda been discussed that giant versions of the artwork aren't really the best thing the wiki needs. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the College-Bound Rurouni'''</span>]] 01:14, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :Oops. Whelp, I guess I should stop uploading them, then! Thanks for the head's up. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 01:15, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Villager (aka Frank) ==
| |
|
| |
| How would you know his name's not Frank? [[Special:Contributions/24.43.113.158|24.43.113.158]] 01:33, 22 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :Villager has no name in ''Super Smash Bros.'', nor does he have a canonical name in the ''Animal Crossing'' series. You would need a reference or a citation as poof otherwise, and given you likely added "Frank" as a joke, I'm inclined to think you won't find one. Please do no vandalize our pages. A lot of people take time and work out of their schedules to prevent good information for others. You are the antithesis to their contributions. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 09:25, 22 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::Nintendo, [[SW:QDV|please read this]]. Thank you. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 10:50, 22 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::Thanks, Vulpine. I will be more respectful in the future. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 10:55, 22 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Pichu Info ==
| |
|
| |
| I added the info about Pichu because it was in his info page for Melee, so I figured it should be added since it does apply to Ultimate.
| |
| :Hi! There's nothing wrong with adding trivia, but if the info is equally applicable to both ''Smash'' entries for Pichu, it should probably be moved to its character page instead. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 23:25, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::Then it should probably be removed from Pichu's Melee page too?
| |
| :::Yes. I would have done it myself, but I didn't know it was on Pichu's Melee page too. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 09:47, 27 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Marth's color palette ==
| |
|
| |
| Hi. In ''Genealogy of the Holy War'', partner units are green, and neutral units are yellow (the reverse of ''Path of Radiance'' and ''Radiant Dawn''). Examples of a partner unit are the paladins that accompany Lachesis in Chapter 2. Please see [[fireemblem:Unit]]. I am a [[fireemblem:Fire Emblem Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators|sysop at Fire Emblem Wiki]], so I think I know what I am talking about. Neither green nor yellow matches Marth's black color, anyway. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 22:24, 2 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::Hi, PikaSamus. I was clearly misinformed. Thank you for enlightening me. I trust that you know your stuff. I think we've actually spoken before on the FE Wiki on potential gallery revisions. Would you mind removing the assertion for Marth's black alt on all of the alternate costume pages? I would myself, but I am currently in transit. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 10:26, 3 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Popo's parka color ==
| |
|
| |
| Your response to my edit was incredibly arrogant. His parka is blue as described by the games themselves. The main article on this very wiki even describes the parka as blue. There is no disputing this. Wiki articles have always tried to be as accurate as possible. If what you say is true, then why does anyone have the right to undo edits anyway? Should I just go in and label Mario's default costume "Green" since accuracy doesn't matter? The attitude here seems to be that my edits amounted to vandalism even though I had a solid basis for each of them. I was trying to be helpful, but I guess I won't make that mistake again. [[Special:Contributions/69.114.138.106|69.114.138.106]] 14:48, 8 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :I apologize if my revision came off as arrogant, as that was not my intended tone. Maybe we just perceive color values differently. When I look at Popo, his parka looks purple. If I were to illustrate Popo, I would not use a shade of blue. I would use purple. If we were to put it to a vote, and the community's consensus was that Popo's parka is blue, then I would leave it alone. However, as Toomai pointed out yesterday, the names of the colors right now are all tentative until ''Ultimate'' is released. I will say, however, that your comparison to Mario is not founded because he ''is'' red. A more accurate comparison would be if Mario's trophy describes him as "green" despite the fact that he is not. We would still call him "red" because [[SmashWiki is not official]] and we could tell just by looking at him that he is not green. For Popo, I think it is notable that the purple parka was used as the blue team costume in Melee, but the dev team included an original blue alt in Brawl for the Blue Team. If the default color of Popo's parks was truly rationalized as "blue", they likely would not have created a new blue alt for Team Battles.
| |
| :I personally did not consider your contributions to be vandalism. I would be surprised if any user did because SmaskWiki policy dictates that we assume good faith. Your revisions seemed justified and well-thought out, and I am sorry that you are feeling frustrated by the fact that they were not being kept. I think part of the issue is that longtime users, including myself, are overly protective of the alternate costume pages because they have been subject to rampant, legitimate vandalism in the past: people assigning DK's blue alt to an obscure computer mascot, assuming purple Dark Pit was the Eggplant Blizzard. Assuming purple Charizard was Ridley. The literal insurrion of memes in the article. It just gets out of hand. I think you are a fine user, and I encourage you to continue contributing the wiki - maybe with your own username. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 15:48, 8 July 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==EarthBound Workshop==
| |
| You have some entirely incorrect information in there. The Franklin Badge '''reflects''' projectiles and items, it has '''''never absorbed''''' them. I didn’t change it because it’s your user space, but what you currently have is complete misinformation.
| |
| :I appreciate your interest and correction, but not your tone. There is a polite way to suggest a change. Thank you. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 13:40, 28 September 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Reverting ==
| |
|
| |
| Hi, when in disagreement with other users about an edit, don't keep reverting like [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Zelda_(SSBU)&diff=next&oldid=1103550 here]-- discuss with them on the talk page instead. Please see [[SW:1RV]]. Thank you. – [[User:Emmett|<span style="color:#000000">Emmett</span>]] 08:11, 17 October 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :Yeah, I slipped up. Sorry. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 13:02, 17 October 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == SSB4 costumes ==
| |
|
| |
| I've made [[Talk:Alternate costume (SSB4)#Disagreements with Nintendo101|a section]] on [[Talk:Alternate costume (SSB4)]], where we can discuss some of the areas in which we disagree. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 07:09, 2 January 2019 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Yoshi's Route ==
| |
|
| |
| Maybe they're not CANONICALLY dinosaurs, but since dragons are based off lizards (despite that Charizard's only a dragon in it's Mega X form), not to mention they all have '''scaly skin''' (a common characteristic reptiles actually HAVE), aren't they all canonically qualified as reptiles in the animal kingdom? --[[User:NinTylo|NinTylo]] ([[User talk:NinTylo|talk]]) 01:03, August 3, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| :My argument wasn't that Ridley is based on a dragon and is thus not a dinosaur. My argument was that pterodactyls are not dinosaurs. I am a biologist and I work as an animal taxonomist off of SmashWiki. For paleontologists and people who study reptiles, "dinosaurs" are only animals that fall within the orders Ornithiscia (which includes animals like ''Iguanodon'' and ''Triceratops'') or Saurischia (which includes ''Velociraptor'', ''Tyrannosaurs rex'', and ''Brontosaurus''). Pterodactyls fall within the order Pterosauria, which represents a different branch on the tree of life. It's a common misconception since pterosaurs lived during the time of dinosaurs and a lot of public literature use to incorrectly conflate the two, but more recent books are getting better at it. I even see recent children's books on dinosaurs clarify that pterosaurs are different creatures from them. I think [https://www.livescience.com/24071-pterodactyl-pteranodon-flying-dinosaurs.html this article] by LiveScience sums up the situation nicely, but further reading is available on Wikipedia. [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 21:08, September 4, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| ::I agree that all of the opponents are based on reptiles and that was a clear theme they were trying to go for (sans Ivysaur, whose evolutionary line is based on frogs as confirmed [https://www.pokemon.co.jp/corporate/en/pikachu/ here] and [https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/ here]), but none of them seem to be based on dinosaurs specifically.[[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101#top|talk]]) 21:13, September 4, 2019 (EDT)
| |