Penro's feedback page
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Positive[edit]
- You're really quite helpful and edit pretty frequently. --BaconMaster331 talk 16:41, 1 February 2016 (EST)
- Sorry for late reply, but thank you! Please leave a message for Penro when you see something wrong I did. 17:08, 4 February 2016 (EST)
- your good at reminding people about stuff! Poultry (talk) EZMONEY!! 17:11, 4 February 2016 (EST)
- Why,thank you! Please leave a message for Penro when you see something wrong I did. 17:12, 4 February 2016 (EST)
- Do you really have any faults....? I've seen none. Ganonmew, The Lovingly Evil Clone 17:15, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Wow, did not expect this. This is very well welcomed! Please leave a message for Penro when you see something wrong I did. 17:18, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- You are active and make a lot of contributions. -- Ethan(Discussion) 19:17, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Thank you! Penro ...that's all. 19:29, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- You assume good faith well Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 19:35, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Thank you for that! Penro ...that's all. 19:37, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Well I don't know you well enough to give you a full analysis, but I'll give you a sort of "scratch the surface" evaluation. You are decently helpful, contributing positively to articles and discussions, as well as trying to help some of our newer users. As far as I can tell (although everyone has something, myself included) you have yet to have any major flaws make themselves apparent, at least on this wiki. Serpent King 19:40, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Thanks man! Penro ...that's all. 19:42, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Aw man, why didn't i get the Thanks man Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 19:46, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- To be honest I'm just coming up with random slogans from my head so... XD. Penro ...that's all. 21:15, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Aw man, why didn't i get the Thanks man Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 19:46, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Thanks man! Penro ...that's all. 19:42, 5 February 2016 (EST)
Negative[edit]
- Your sig feels a little long at the moment. --BaconMaster 17:18, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Fixed. Penro ...that's all. 17:20, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Tweaking my userpage without permission, when nothing was wrong with it. Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 17:23, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- That's about it though Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 17:32, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Yeah,that was a huge mistake on my part. I'll be sure not to so that agin. Penro ...that's all. 19:11, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Ironically can someone help me on http://www.ssbwiki.com/User:KirbysCrazyAppetite/SSB_Weight_Chart_Test ? I can't figure out how to get rid of the approriate columns Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 19:35, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Yeah,that was a huge mistake on my part. I'll be sure not to so that agin. Penro ...that's all. 19:11, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- That's about it though Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 17:32, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- You update your signature a little too much. -- Ethan(Discussion) 19:17, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Yeah, I'll probably stop. Penro ...that's all. 19:29, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- We've discussed this already, but the warnings for talk pages needing archived are unnecessary, other than that, I'd say you're good. Serpent King 19:40, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- Don't worry;I've stopped. Penro ...that's all. 19:42, 5 February 2016 (EST)
- You tag just about all your edits as minor, even if they're major.
- You asked a user to update something when their last edit happened 20 days ago. I'm assuming that he/she showed up in the "Who's Online" thing, but it's not a necessary reminder.
- You posted a reminder about show preview on an IP's talk page when said IP's only made one edit. I assume you meant to put the notability template, but even then, they've only made one edit. MegaTron1 20:50, 25 April 2016 (EDT)
- Noted. Thank you.
- Again, noted. Thanks.
- I personally like going to the talk page about proof of notability, since it's quite unlikely that they'll read the summary and they'll get the notice thingy. Penro 20:55, 25 April 2016 (EDT)
- Going to a talk page of a non-repeat offender automatically assumes that they won't listen to what you said in the edit summary. Assuming good faith wouldn't be hard when all you have to do is undo their edit again. Worries about flooding recent changes or edit histories are pretty unwarranted, especially since edit patrolling the recent changes doesn't seem to be a common thing to do on the Wiki anymore. MegaTron1 21:18, 25 April 2016 (EDT)