| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Old Stuff==
| |
| I can't say I'm confortable with having Sheik and Ganondorf in the template already; the interview stated how their character designs were submitted to Sakurai for Brawl, but does that mean he actually used them? :D Obviously it's likely they'll be in there, so the existence of their separate articles are just fine, but if we haven't seen any images of them yet I would support holding off on putting them in the template itself until they are seen, and just rely on the categories. [[User:Erik the Appreciator|Erik the Appreciator]] 15:39, August 3, 2007 (EDT) | | I can't say I'm confortable with having Sheik and Ganondorf in the template already; the interview stated how their character designs were submitted to Sakurai for Brawl, but does that mean he actually used them? :D Obviously it's likely they'll be in there, so the existence of their separate articles are just fine, but if we haven't seen any images of them yet I would support holding off on putting them in the template itself until they are seen, and just rely on the categories. [[User:Erik the Appreciator|Erik the Appreciator]] 15:39, August 3, 2007 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| Line 5: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| : Who even knows if these two are playable? I mean, of course it's likely, but what if, say, Sakurai uses the Sheik model, but it's only for an Assist Trophy? I'm a bit iffy on these guys even having profiles right now because even though Aounoma practically said they'd be in the game, he didn't say they'd be ''playable'' in the game. -[[User:Thores|Thores]] 16:55, August 3, 2007 (EDT) | | : Who even knows if these two are playable? I mean, of course it's likely, but what if, say, Sakurai uses the Sheik model, but it's only for an Assist Trophy? I'm a bit iffy on these guys even having profiles right now because even though Aounoma practically said they'd be in the game, he didn't say they'd be ''playable'' in the game. -[[User:Thores|Thores]] 16:55, August 3, 2007 (EDT) |
|
| |
| ==Recruiting==
| |
| '''OK all who are willing. I need lots of help. I need all the moveset to look all alike. I need people willing to help! If you choose to accept this challenge, use [[Meta Knight (SSBB)|Meta Knight]]'s moveset as a perfect example. If you want to help the cause, leave your username under the category on my userpage called "Recruiting". This message is also their. Let's fix these movesets.''' --[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] ([[User talk:Oxico|talk]]) 20:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Scrapped Characters==
| |
| Should we include a 'removed characters' row to this section? It could include the articles [[Mewtwo (SSBB)]] and [[Roy (SSBB)]], as well as the articles like [[Toon Zelda & Sheik]] if they aren't getting deleted. Either put them there, or they could get their own separate template. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 13:29, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| :That would work. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:MatchupUnknown.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 13:30, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| ::'''Oppose''' There is no official confirmation these characters were indeed planned but scrapped, so such a template would be speculation. Plus, I see no use for such a template. Also, that Toon Zelda article is going to be deleted. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:33, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| :::I suggested a separate template because when on the new Mewtwo (SSBB) article, I felt there needed to be a way to link it to Roy (SSBB). Perhaps just a 'See Also' section, then? [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 13:35, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| ::::If those articles are kept, they should just link to the Beta elements article and its scrapped characters section. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:42, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| :::::Alternatively, since the [[Beta elements]] article is quite large, we could create another article called "[Scrapped Characters]" and list the characters there. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:MatchupUnknown.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 13:50, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| ::::::I would agree with that. Though the article would be better under a name like '''Cancelled Characters''', '''Unfinished Characters''', '''Unused Character Data''' or '''Beta Characters'''. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 13:52, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
| :::::::No Beta Characters! <span style="font-family:Agency FB; font-size:12pt">[[User:BlindColours|<font color="black">'''Blind'''</font>]]</span><span style="font-family: Berlin Sans FB; font-size:12pt">[[User talk:BlindColours|<font color="red">C</font><font color="purple">ol</font>]][[ Special:Contributions/BlindColours|<font color="green">ou</font><font color="seablue">rs</font>]]</span> [[File:Boing.png|50px]] 14:11, 26 November 2011 (EST)
| |
Log in
