Editing Template talk:Infobox Smasher
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 358: | Line 358: | ||
::::"''Maintaining.''" | ::::"''Maintaining.''" | ||
::::This is incredibly simple though? Any new result has to be added to the player's tournament result | ::::This is incredibly simple though? Any new result has to be added to the player's tournament result page in the first place, you can easily take that time to replace the best result listing while doing that, not to mention that standout performances at majors generally get highlighted and so it's not something people will "forget" to do. Compare this to maintain skill listings, where aside from the constant edit warring, there is no clear time to "upgrade" a skill level. | ||
::::"''with the added downside of not being able to be tracked in edits.''" | ::::"''with the added downside of not being able to be tracked in edits.''" | ||
Line 366: | Line 366: | ||
::::"''Also, in many cases a player will have results which are very comparable, and it will essentially be to the editor's discretion to decide which one is best, even if it isn't "correct".''" | ::::"''Also, in many cases a player will have results which are very comparable, and it will essentially be to the editor's discretion to decide which one is best, even if it isn't "correct".''" | ||
::::People nitpicking about which supermajor win for a few top players was their best is far more preferable to deal with than people constantly bitching and moaning that they or their favorite player aren't labelled "top level" and edit warring us over it | ::::People nitpicking about which supermajor win for a few top players was their best is far more preferable to deal with than people constantly bitching and moaning that they or their favorite player aren't labelled "top level" and edit warring us over it. | ||
::::"''Crowded infobox. I fear that listing someones best result, current ranking, and best ranking for multiple games (3+) would be too much information and could get really crowded to the point where it hurts readability.''" | ::::"''Crowded infobox. I fear that listing someones best result, current ranking, and best ranking for multiple games (3+) would be too much information and could get really crowded to the point where it hurts readability.''" |