| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 49: |
Line 49: |
| #None of the attacks, specials, smashes, etc. cause significant hitlag, making it harder to DI. | | #None of the attacks, specials, smashes, etc. cause significant hitlag, making it harder to DI. |
| #No tripping. | | #No tripping. |
|
| |
| Short reason: More offense. [[User:Avengingbandit|<font face="Soft Hits" color="#FF7F00">'''Avenging'''</font>]][[User talk:Avengingbandit|<font face="Soft Hits" color="#FF7F00">'''bandit'''</font>]] [[File:Matchup2of8.png|20px|link=Special:Contributions/Avengingbandit]] 04:07, 5 January 2012 (EST) | | Short reason: More offense. [[User:Avengingbandit|<font face="Soft Hits" color="#FF7F00">'''Avenging'''</font>]][[User talk:Avengingbandit|<font face="Soft Hits" color="#FF7F00">'''bandit'''</font>]] [[File:Matchup2of8.png|20px|link=Special:Contributions/Avengingbandit]] 04:07, 5 January 2012 (EST) |
| :Dude take that to the forum, and all the things you said are OPINION as these xhanges isnt always bad. Bright side, more character, stages, modes storyline etc... [[User:Lucasthefourth|<span style="color:red"> :o '''Lucas'''</span>]][[User talk:Lucasthefourth|'''-IV-''']] [[Special:Contributions/Lucasthefourth|'''CREEP''']] [[Image:MCLucas.png|25px]] 04:25, 5 January 2012 (EST) | | :Dude take that to the forum, and all the things you said are OPINION as these xhanges isnt always bad. Bright side, more character, stages, modes storyline etc... [[User:Lucasthefourth|<span style="color:red"> :o '''Lucas'''</span>]][[User talk:Lucasthefourth|'''-IV-''']] [[Special:Contributions/Lucasthefourth|'''CREEP''']] [[Image:MCLucas.png|25px]] 04:25, 5 January 2012 (EST) |
| Line 58: |
Line 57: |
|
| |
|
| Brawl is the BEST in the series [so far]. But, I was sad when I found out Mewtwo wasn't there.[[User:Sandvich9|Sandvich9]] ([[User talk:Sandvich9|talk]]) 23:48, 5 October 2012 (EDT) | | Brawl is the BEST in the series [so far]. But, I was sad when I found out Mewtwo wasn't there.[[User:Sandvich9|Sandvich9]] ([[User talk:Sandvich9|talk]]) 23:48, 5 October 2012 (EDT) |
| :By giving an opinion that does not offer anything in regards to improving this article, you are also violating [[SW:TALK]]. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 09:14, 6 October 2012 (EDT) brawl is the best wii game other then twilight princess. | | :By giving an opinion that does not offer anything in regards to improving this article, you are also violating [[SW:TALK]]. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 09:14, 6 October 2012 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| == ESRB Rating == | | == ESRB Rating == |
| Line 98: |
Line 97: |
| :I would not mind that. I agree that sometimes the over-linking of images is annoying, but in this case it'd be an improvement. — [[User:Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon|Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon]] ([[User talk:Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon|talk]]) [[File:Jigglypuff_the_Magic_Dragon_sig.png]] 12:31, 30 December 2013 (EST) | | :I would not mind that. I agree that sometimes the over-linking of images is annoying, but in this case it'd be an improvement. — [[User:Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon|Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon]] ([[User talk:Jigglypuff the Magic Dragon|talk]]) [[File:Jigglypuff_the_Magic_Dragon_sig.png]] 12:31, 30 December 2013 (EST) |
| :What I don't understand is why this would be necessary if links to the character pages are right under their pictures? <span style="font-family:Impact">''[[User:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#CC5500">BRAWLS</span>]] [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]] OF [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]][[User talk:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#8A3324">FURY</span>]]''</span> 15:39, 30 December 2013 (EST) | | :What I don't understand is why this would be necessary if links to the character pages are right under their pictures? <span style="font-family:Impact">''[[User:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#CC5500">BRAWLS</span>]] [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]] OF [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]][[User talk:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#8A3324">FURY</span>]]''</span> 15:39, 30 December 2013 (EST) |
| ::To minimize the amount of clicks a typical reader will have to do to reach the page they want, I think. [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 15:47, 30 December 2013 (EST)
| |
| I think this is a good idea, however, since it seems a bit unnecessary to have two things that link to the same page right next to each other, I think it would also be a good idea to unlink the names of the characters (and probably the stages too since their images ought to be linked) while the images can be linked to what they represent. <span style="font-family:Impact">''[[User:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#CC5500">BRAWLS</span>]] [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]] OF [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]][[User talk:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#8A3324">FURY</span>]]''</span> 00:10, 31 December 2013 (EST)
| |
| :I don't agree with removing the links in the character names. It's not like we're desperate for space and can't handle the tag around the character names, so I see no reason to remove them. Sure it's redundant, but users are used to seeing blue links and it makes these tables easier to navigate. We need to decide on a standard for these tables for consistency's sake. Right now, Brawl has image links and no character links, but every other game has both. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 08:57, 1 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| ::I will assume that the linked images were intended for the typical reader since you left no rebuttal that would say otherwise to Scr7 or I and that everything else Scr7 said is also true for the same reason. I will define "typical" as being synonymous with "usual" and "common" so that we could also say "common readers". Since the linked images were intended for the typical reader because the typical reader would click on the images to go to the characters page, I thought that linking to the characters page in the names is unnecessary and should be removed since it wouldn't be used by the typical user. There are also links in the names of the characters in the section titled "Voice actors". With there being several links in the article to the characters pages and typical users clicking on the images in the table cells (not the names) it shouldn't be hard to navigate the article or the table. You also said that this would "save numerous clicks". If we leave the linked names in, the typical user may also click on the image and the linked name thinking that they linked to different pages since it would be unnecessary/wouldn't make sense to have the links right next to each other, and the typical user making numerous and unnecessary clicks also went against the idea of adding the linked images. Finally, I think that leaving the linked names in would be bad style per [[SW:MoS]]:
| |
| ::"''Generally, only link to an article once. If "damage" is mentioned five times on a page, it should only link to [[damage]] the first time. The exception is if the page is very long, in which case it can be linked again near the start of a later section. ''".
| |
| ::This is what I would consider a long article. That is why rather than having the links in the same place, I got rid of the unnecessary links that were in the same place and left the ones that linked to the same pages in a different section. I would also be fine with fixing the other articles to be more like this one for the sake of consistency. Also, claiming something along the lines of "There's no reason not to" is a bad premise since that doesn't justify doing so/mean that not doing so is the inferior option. <span style="font-family:Impact">''[[User:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#CC5500">BRAWLS</span>]] [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]] OF [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]][[User talk:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#8A3324">FURY</span>]]''</span> 18:40, 1 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| We went over this and you never really gave a reason as to why we should get rid of the links in the names. It makes it easier to navigate. No, it doesn't make it hard to navigate or confuse people to have both. And yes, some people will use one while some will use the other. Not everyone expects an image to be a link, so some people will go to the name to click there. Some people will naturally click on the image, so it makes sense for that to link as well. Seriously, why are you so passionate about there not being links in the names? It's just more navigable and user friendly. And I don't think the cited portion of [[SW:MoS]] applies in a table, which is reminiscent of a menu more so than a book. That portion of the manual of style just means you shouldn't link ever instance of the word Fox to the Fox page in an article about waveshining. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 01:57, 27 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :"''And I don't think the cited portion of [[SW:MoS]] applies in a table, which is reminiscent of a menu more so than a book.''"
| |
| :You think correctly. Since [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REPEATLINK#What_generally_should_not_be_linked| Wikipedia says so also], I will amend the Manual of Style to make it more clear since no user should ever be forced to assume what a guideline means. Since this is what the Manual of Style means, I will discard my other points and leave the links in the names. <span style="font-family:Impact">''[[User:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#CC5500">BRAWLS</span>]] [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]] OF [[File:BoFSig.png|19px]][[User talk:Brawls of fury|<span style="color:#8A3324">FURY</span>]]''</span> 15:25, 27 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Character Images ==
| |
| I have copies of all the characters without the blue background that I can upload for this page. It would definitely clean up the character list a bit and look more streamlined. What do you guys think? <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-size:10pt">[[User:Johnnywellens|<span style="color:forestgreen">JohnnyWellens</span>]]</span> [[Image: SonicHeadSSB4-3.png ]] 16:40, 22 April 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Only Appearance? ==
| |
| The list says this game is Toon Link, ROB and Game and Watch's only Wii appearance (barring virtual console) but I checked and all appeared in the Wii's Warioware instalment. Does that count? [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] ([[User talk:Guybrush20X6|talk]]) 15:47, 17 May 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :I guess they appear as a cameo. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Link OoT Dots.PNG|16px]] The Happy 15:51, 17 May 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::As the subjects of Microgames, so yes. Would it count? [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] ([[User talk:Guybrush20X6|talk]]) 16:01, 17 May 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::They Removed that one bit of trivia on Shiek's page about how OoT was her only non-SSB appearance when she got a cameo in Scribblenauts, so I would assume it'd be fine. [[User:Laikue|Laikue]] ([[User talk:Laikue|talk]]) 21:54, 17 May 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Only game to have a newcomer in the top teir? ==
| |
|
| |
| This trivia is a bit vague. And false if taken at face value, Sheik was top teir for a lot of Melee's life if I remember. [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] ([[User talk:Guybrush20X6|talk]]) 04:45, 6 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :My apologies. What I meant is that ''Brawl'' is the first game to have a newcomer rank first on its tier list. This is actually true as in ''Melee'', Fox ranked number one, and Fox was a veteran. '''[[User:MeatBall104|MeatBall104;]]''' [[User Talk:MeatBall104|With dirty rice]] [[Special:Contributions/MeatBall104|on teh side!]] 09:46, 6 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::OT's already removed the trivia in question, both because of the time period where Sheik was #1 in Melee but also because "only one of two possible times did this happen" doesn't make for good trivia. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 09:53, 6 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Odd wording ==
| |
|
| |
| I was looking at the page and saw this: "There is a landing lag glitch on not all but several characters, that causes the character when they land to be inflicted with the landing lag of a helplessness-inducing special move, if they grabbed the edge during the move, or after using the move before landing." It is oddly worded. Can someone help me and change this? [[User:Da Random Bro|Da Random Bro]] ([[User talk:Da Random Bro|talk]]) 19:45, 9 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==items? Assist trophies?==
| |
| Should there be a list of items and one of assist trophies? I can't make one myself, but it seems like a good idea. [[User:Littlesquirtle|Littlesquirtle]] ([[User talk:Littlesquirtle|talk]]) 20:17, 1 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :First off, when making a new section, put it at the ''bottom'' of the page, not the top. Second, no, that's why we have [[Assist Trophy|this page]] and [[Item|this page]] for. [[User: Rtzxy | <span style="color:darkorange;"> '''Rtzxy''' </span>]] [[File:Signature SmashBall.jpeg]] [[User talk: Rtzxy | <span style="color:darkblue;"> '''Smashing!''' </span>]] 20:41, 1 October 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Reception ==
| |
|
| |
| Hey Miles. Any reason why you removed [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl&diff=692096&oldid=690057 this]? [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Snoopy 20:52, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :Opinionated and represents one of many opinions on Brawl, and not really even close to neutral in tone. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 22:17, 27 August 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Another version? ==
| |
|
| |
| I don't remember that much but I think years ago I went by some friend's house down the street. She had Super Smash Bros Brawl. and I think I saw a GameCube version of the Super Smash Bros Brawl. But we couldn't play it because there was no memory card inserted in the Wii Console.
| |
|
| |
| I couldn't find results of a GameCube version anywhere and I both me and my friend doesn't live at where the event took place anymore. I haven't seen her in years. But this is just to tell you that there might be a GameCube version for it and there are probably no results about a GameCube version for it.
| |
| :You're thinking of [[Super Smash Bros. Melee]], which is available for the GameCube. [[File:AidanzapunkSig1.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Wandering Dragon Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkSig2.png|20px]] 16:11, 2 September 2016 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Character table error ==
| |
|
| |
| On the characters table in the veteran section, Yoshi has the Mario universe symbol instead of the Yoshi universe symbol. [[User: Zero93|Zero93]] 14:10, 26th June 2018 (GMT)
| |
| :Fixed. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 10:24, 26 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| There is another error I've just noticed on the character table, the Luigi text isn't in bold to indicate that he is unlockable. [[User: Zero93|Zero93]] 11:52, 27th June 2018 (GMT)
| |
| :Too easy, anything else? [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 11:52, 27 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::Looks better now. I'm a new user on this site, and when I was trying to edit the table it wouldn't let me for some reason, is their certain restrictions for new users? [[User: Zero93|Zero93]] 22:02, 28th June 2018 (GMT)
| |
| :::Normally there is, you would need to be [[SW:AUTO|autoconfirmed]], but the table is actually a transcluded template, on a separate page. To edit the table, you have to edit the template, which if it was semi-protected (its not however), you would not be able to do. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 00:28, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
| |
Log in
