Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| *Although a lot less applicable than in professional matches, character [[tier]]s can also be taken into account when selecting a player to bet on. | | *Although a lot less applicable than in professional matches, character [[tier]]s can also be taken into account when selecting a player to bet on. |
| *If there are several [[taunt match]] characters, specially if they're all the same, and one character who doesn't fit, there is a chance that the latter will attempt to ruin the taunt party. Given that the match might become a 3-to-1 fight, the party crasher might lose. | | *If there are several [[taunt match]] characters, specially if they're all the same, and one character who doesn't fit, there is a chance that the latter will attempt to ruin the taunt party. Given that the match might become a 3-to-1 fight, the party crasher might lose. |
| *Paying attention to the character and stage combinations can also help tremendously in some cases. For instance, if a team of two Ikes is fighting a Fox and Kirby team, on [[Big Blue]], the Ike team will likely lose, given that if they get bumped onto the track, their horrible recovery won't stop them from getting back, whereas the same doesn't happen with Fox or Kirby.
| |
|
| |
| == Tense ==
| |
|
| |
| I don't see why the SSBB part of the article should be in the present tense, as it would be factually wrong - saying it "Is available on Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection" is wrong, since neither the mode itself, nor the service are available. Yes, the Intro and, when it's released, the SSB4 section should be present tense, but even considering consistency, it's... well, illogical. Have I missed something here? Is there a consistency rule? Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 05:59, 26 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :Did you not see the cleanup tag right there at the top of the page? It's in present tense because nobody fixed it yet, not because of some conscious effort to keep it present tense. So instead of pointing out what we already know, go fix it. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 06:08, 26 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::No, I did see it, but Qwerty's last edit added additional to the cleanup, saying "should ''not'' be in past tense", and changed one instance of past to present, so I'd be breaking SW:1RV. Thanks anyways. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 06:13, 26 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::I didn't word it correctly. I meant to write that everything did not have to be in past tense; for example: "...over time, they make a net loss..." or "When viewing a match, only characters used are shown...", where the article is describing a player's action during the mechanic. <font face="sand">[[User:Qwerty|<font color="#04FE6D">Qwerty</font>]] [[User talk:Qwerty|<font color="#665C2A">the</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Qwerty|<font color="#08CFCC">lord</font>]] [[File:Nessytrewq.jpg|16px]]</font> 11:18, 26 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Randomisation Errors? ==
| |
|
| |
| Whilst randomly idling in Spectator (SSB4), I got the exact same game twice in the same session (within about an hour.) Notable, or just an isolated incident? I'm not sure. Anyone else seen this? Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 10:57, 25 February 2015 (EST)
| |
| :Same set of THREE games actually... So I was likley shifted a few back in the game queue. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 11:00, 25 February 2015 (EST)
| |