Editing Talk:Prima Games
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:Creating articles for the other two would just create unnecessary clutter. I think it'd be best to have all three on one page rather than than all three being separate. It would increase the size of the article immensely. Prima is definitely well-known within the community for obvious reasons, but I'd imagine the other two publishers have their share of errors as well. The new page could have a section detailing every notable mistake or false claim from each respective guide. [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 00:38, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | :Creating articles for the other two would just create unnecessary clutter. I think it'd be best to have all three on one page rather than than all three being separate. It would increase the size of the article immensely. Prima is definitely well-known within the community for obvious reasons, but I'd imagine the other two publishers have their share of errors as well. The new page could have a section detailing every notable mistake or false claim from each respective guide. [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 00:38, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | ||
::Just because they're factually questionable doesn't mean they're not well-known enough to have their own individual articles. And if it's "well-known within the community," as you say it is, that should settle the question by itself. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 11:49, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | ::Just because they're factually questionable doesn't mean they're not well-known enough to have their own individual articles. And if it's "well-known within the community," as you say it is, that should settle the question by itself. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 11:49, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | ||
'''Oppose'''. Brady Games only covered the ''64'' strategy guide, they are clearly a predecessor to Prima Games, rather than something that should be given equal treatment. Separate page, or just a piece of information on here stating that they predated Prima Games' efforts. Nintendo Power is worthy of its own article, due to its continued coverage of ''Super Smash Bros.'', and indeed the strategy guide. Prima Games is by far the largest publisher of ''Smash'' strategy guides (and strategy guides in general) and is worthy of its own page. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">Toast</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 01:32, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | '''Oppose'''. Brady Games only covered the ''64'' strategy guide, they are clearly a predecessor to Prima Games, rather than something that should be given equal treatment. Separate page, or just a piece of information on here stating that they predated Prima Games' efforts. Nintendo Power is worthy of its own article, due to its continued coverage of ''Super Smash Bros.'', and indeed the strategy guide. Prima Games is by far the largest publisher of ''Smash'' strategy guides (and strategy guides in general) and is worthy of its own page. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">Toast</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 01:32, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | ||
:Huh, I knew they made a 64 guide, but I didn't know that was the only one they published. Regardless, I still believe that a general "strategy guides" page would be better than just this. Creating one big page with info on all strategy guides sounds better than having all it's content spread across multiple pages with one publisher barely getting a small mention. [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 01:59, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | :Huh, I knew they made a 64 guide, but I didn't know that was the only one they published. Regardless, I still believe that a general "strategy guides" page would be better than just this. Creating one big page with info on all strategy guides sounds better than having all it's content spread across multiple pages with one publisher barely getting a small mention. [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 01:59, 29 March 2018 (EDT) | ||