Editing Talk:Pokémon Trainer (SSBB)
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
I'm uncertain that the words he says changes depending on how many KO's his pokemon achieve. He has said Amazing job, despite the fact that there hasn't even been 6 KO's done total by everyone (although I am quite aware that the article says the KO's dealt by his pokemon, I say done by everyone as a total, to make a point). It seems to me more likely, that the words he says, is determined by 3 things. 1, how long a pokemon has been out. 2, how much damage that pokemon may have dealt. And 3, how much damage that pokemon has taken during its time out. Can we look into this again? [[User:Learner4|Learner4]] ([[User talk:Learner4|talk]]) 15:58, September 26, 2010 (UTC) | I'm uncertain that the words he says changes depending on how many KO's his pokemon achieve. He has said Amazing job, despite the fact that there hasn't even been 6 KO's done total by everyone (although I am quite aware that the article says the KO's dealt by his pokemon, I say done by everyone as a total, to make a point). It seems to me more likely, that the words he says, is determined by 3 things. 1, how long a pokemon has been out. 2, how much damage that pokemon may have dealt. And 3, how much damage that pokemon has taken during its time out. Can we look into this again? [[User:Learner4|Learner4]] ([[User talk:Learner4|talk]]) 15:58, September 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Unnecessary Info in the Intro== | ==Unnecessary Info in the Intro== | ||
Anyone else think that some of the information in the intro should be removed? While all of it is true, having a massive amount of info in the intro hurts the pacing, as well as the fact that it all could be placed elsewhere. Even the tag at the top says this article is way too long compared to other character articles. Who else agrees with me? [[Special:Contributions/71.105.121.171|71.105.121.171]] 12:11, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | Anyone else think that some of the information in the intro should be removed? While all of it is true, having a massive amount of info in the intro hurts the pacing, as well as the fact that it all could be placed elsewhere. Even the tag at the top says this article is way too long compared to other character articles. Who else agrees with me? [[Special:Contributions/71.105.121.171|71.105.121.171]] 12:11, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
:It doesn't belong in the intro, that's for sure, but it does belong in the article somewhere. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] Le Grand Fromage 12:12, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | :It doesn't belong in the intro, that's for sure, but it does belong in the article somewhere. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] Le Grand Fromage 12:12, 25 August 2013 (EDT) | ||