Editing Talk:List of rumors
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
With this clean start, I'd like to bump the [[Forum:Major overhaul for "List of rumors"|cleanup project]] that got unanimous approval but no real progress. To recap: '''Rumors should only be listed once they are disproven''', '''rumors should be written about from an objective, neutral standpoint with emphasis on citations''', '''only the most notable rumors should be added.''' None of the Bigby Wolf or "Does not perform well in Autumn" nonsense. I'd like to get a discussion rolling on which entries are fit to take out, but I think it's a good time to move ahead with this. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 20:37, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | With this clean start, I'd like to bump the [[Forum:Major overhaul for "List of rumors"|cleanup project]] that got unanimous approval but no real progress. To recap: '''Rumors should only be listed once they are disproven''', '''rumors should be written about from an objective, neutral standpoint with emphasis on citations''', '''only the most notable rumors should be added.''' None of the Bigby Wolf or "Does not perform well in Autumn" nonsense. I'd like to get a discussion rolling on which entries are fit to take out, but I think it's a good time to move ahead with this. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 20:37, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:Coming back to this, would we be okay with removing all speculative statements like this example from the Doom Mii Costume Leak, "However, the leak came to light in November 2019, so it would be odd if the costumes in it were finalized nearly a year before their addition." Statements like this are purely speculative without any factual basis, and clutter the page. Would be best to keep the page as factual and unbiased as possible. [[Special:Contributions/58.168.4.52|58.168.4.52]] 03:32, October 2, 2020 (EDT) | :Coming back to this, would we be okay with removing all speculative statements like this example from the Doom Mii Costume Leak, "However, the leak came to light in November 2019, so it would be odd if the costumes in it were finalized nearly a year before their addition." Statements like this are purely speculative without any factual basis, and clutter the page. Would be best to keep the page as factual and unbiased as possible. [[Special:Contributions/58.168.4.52|58.168.4.52]] 03:32, October 2, 2020 (EDT) | ||
If rumors that are disproven go here why's Loz18 still on the leak page, he admitted to making it all up and getting lucky | |||
==[https://www.inverse.com/gaming/smash-ultimate-ssbu-dlc-leaks-fighter-pass-2-arms-waluigi This rumor inverse said about an anonymous 4chan user...]== | ==[https://www.inverse.com/gaming/smash-ultimate-ssbu-dlc-leaks-fighter-pass-2-arms-waluigi This rumor inverse said about an anonymous 4chan user...]== |