| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| why do so many characters have ? for their matchups,and in some cases like ice climbers for the majority of the cast?also what does the M mean under the matchup for themselves,shouldnt it just be considered a 50/50[[User:Gig|Gig]] ([[User talk:Gig|talk]]) 03:12, 10 October 2010 (EDT) | | why do so many characters have ? for their matchups,and in some cases like ice climbers for the majority of the cast?also what does the M mean under the matchup for themselves,shouldnt it just be considered a 50/50[[User:Gig|Gig]] ([[User talk:Gig|talk]]) 03:12, 10 October 2010 (EDT) |
| :The matchups we list are the ones from each respective character board on SWF, who decide their matchup ratio against a character and report (which is also the reason why two characters may have two different matchup ratios listed against each other). Needless to say, they can be lazy and never discuss or did not yet finish a recent discussion about a particular matchup. In this case, we have no matchup to report and can only list it as "?". As for the dittos, a ditto match is much different than fighting another character that your character has a 50/50 matchup against. As such, it is better to have the matchup listed as "M" to denote that it is the same character and that there really is no matchup ratio. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 03:23, 10 October 2010 (EDT) | | :The matchups we list are the ones from each respective character board on SWF, who decide their matchup ratio against a character and report (which is also the reason why two characters may have two different matchup ratios listed against each other). Needless to say, they can be lazy and never discuss or did not yet finish a recent discussion about a particular matchup. In this case, we have no matchup to report and can only list it as "?". As for the dittos, a ditto match is much different than fighting another character that your character has a 50/50 matchup against. As such, it is better to have the matchup listed as "M" to denote that it is the same character and that there really is no matchup ratio. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 03:23, 10 October 2010 (EDT) |
|
| |
| ..great so not only are they lazy theyre disorganized...makes me question just how trustworthy matchups are....also a 50/50 matchup means its an even battle where skill is the only real significant factor right,well it doesnt get any more even than a ditto match so its 50/50 no,just seems like the most logical thing to me[[User:Gig|Gig]] ([[User talk:Gig|talk]]) 03:53, 10 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
| :As for their matchups being trustworthy, they're the closest thing around to "official matchups", so if we're to report matchups, that is what we have to report. Myself, among many others, consider them legit as well (mostly). As for ditto matches, they're an entirely different matchup experience. It is technically 50:50, but as said before, a ditto match is going to produce a much different kind of match than a matchup of two different characters who have a true 50:50 matchup against each other. As such, it would be rather misleading to list a ditto match in the category of 50:50 matchups. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span>[[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 04:03, 10 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
| ==Table==
| |
| Frankly, it looks horrible, what with the fanon names and copied descriptions. Toomai has better things in plan, and what we have now is better than the table you made.<span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 21:38, 10 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Oh, whoops
| |
| Let me get a better one
| |
|
| |
| I think I might make a temple for it actually from marios
| |
| :I recommend not doing so. Toomai can make a better one as said. If you're like the average person, you likely have no clue how to determine some of the info on those lists.<span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 21:44, 10 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| who's Tommai? [[Special:Contributions/108.11.194.149|108.11.194.149]] 15:43, 11 February 2011 (EST)
| |
| :[[User:Toomai|The biggest of cheese]]. Also, the format will look like what you see on [[Mario (SSBB)]]. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 16:54, 11 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Clean up Talk page ==
| |
|
| |
| Are some of this conversations out dated. They most of confirmed the special moves by now. [[Special:Contributions/108.11.194.149|108.11.194.149]] 15:44, 11 February 2011 (EST)
| |
| :Old talk page conversations of that nature can be ignored, then. And if the page gets too full, archived (though this isn't so big as to need that anytime soon). [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 16:52, 11 February 2011 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Why where Ice Climbers Cut?! ==
| |
|
| |
| ===Ice Climbers===
| |
|
| |
| I Think we all were Pretty Mad when Ice climbers were cut.Even if you never knew about them they were probably your favorites.I hope they come back as DLC
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| EnderNan 12:36, 6 December 2014 (EST)EnderNanEnderNan 12:36, 6 December 2014 (EST)
| |
| :Please read [[SW:TALK]]. But, they were cut because the 3DS couldn't handle controlling two characters at once. So DLC is out of the question. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]] </small> 12:38, 6 December 2014 (EST)
| |
| I am new here so I'm a bad editor <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:EnderNan|EnderNan]] ([[User talk:EnderNan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EnderNan|contribs]]) 20:08, 6 December 2014 (EST)</small>
| |
|
| |
| == Fusion glitch? ==
| |
|
| |
| EDIT: Never mind. For some reason, the fusion glitch page isn't categorized under "Ice Climbers" or even "Ice Climbers (SSBB)", unlike Wobbling. Fixing that now.
| |
Log in
