| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| == Small error in description == | | == Small error in description == |
|
| |
|
| Ganondorf actually can kill himself with this move. If used on top of a falling block platform with nothing below him, the block will fall during the final smash animation and after the final smash has occured, Ganondorf will be warped to the location of the block (i.e. off the screen) and SD. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:74.192.153.219|74.192.153.219]] ([[User talk:74.192.153.219|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/74.192.153.219|contribs]]) 16:40, April 26, 2008 (UTC)</small> | | Ganondorf actually can kill himself with this move. If used on top of a falling block platform with nothing below him, the block will fall during the final smash animation and after the final smash has occured, Ganondorf will be warped to the location of the block (i.e. off the screen) and SD. |
|
| |
|
| ==Was that right?== | | ==Was that right?== |
| Line 66: |
Line 66: |
| ::::No. The Ganon page is for the boss, and the move page is for the move, and because they're named differently, then they don't need to share a name with a distinguisher. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 19:34, June 25, 2019 (EDT) | | ::::No. The Ganon page is for the boss, and the move page is for the move, and because they're named differently, then they don't need to share a name with a distinguisher. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 19:34, June 25, 2019 (EDT) |
| :::::Oh. I thought it would have been better as it would have referred to both name simultaneously. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 19:38, June 25, 2019 (EDT) | | :::::Oh. I thought it would have been better as it would have referred to both name simultaneously. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 19:38, June 25, 2019 (EDT) |
|
| |
| == Move take seventy-seven ==
| |
|
| |
| Frankly, it doesn't even look like the discussion was resolved to begin with, although I didn't read this conversation as thoroughly as I did [[Poltergust G-00]]. Either way, my argument is basically the same as it is on [[Talk:Poltergust G-00]] and I don't feel like repeating in great detail, so in summary:
| |
| #Not a single person in the real world is going to call this move "Ganon, The Demon King". It's gonna be "Beast Ganon" or "Ganon" because that actually sounds like an attack and not just Ganondorf breaking into Sakurai's studio at night to try to make himself sound cooler.
| |
| #This name sums up both iterations better, albeit less than Poltergust G-00; at least as far as I'm aware, though, the title "Demon King" is never used for any version of Beast Ganon except Ocarina of Time (and maybe Hyrule Warriors?) while Beast Ganon is at least common vernacular in the Zelda community if not ever an official name. This could also be a point in favor of just "Ganon", since that's canon across the board and popular in the community.
| |
| I have no preference for either Beast Ganon or Ganon, but Ganon, The Demon King is actually an awful page name so let's do something about it. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 16:59, July 21, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :I prefer moving the page to [[Ganon (Final Smash)]], in a similar vein to Petey Piranha. "Beast Ganon" is sometimes used unofficially to refer to all his demonic incarnations but in the Zelda canon it refers only to the Twilight Princess appearance so I think it's no longer an appropriate title. --[[User:Rdrfc|Rdrfc]] ([[User talk:Rdrfc|talk]]) 06:39, August 21, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::I think the page is fine as it is. Ganon, the Demon King is a perfectly fine name in my opinion, and while I know this wiki doesn't always abide by official names, that should only be in special circumstances where the fan name is much more commonly used by the Smash community than the official one is, such as how ukemi is constantly called teching. [[Special:Contributions/72.219.72.215|72.219.72.215]] 23:45, September 23, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :::I don't see how "not a single person in the real world is going to call this move "Ganon, The Demon King"" is a valid point, because people will use abbreviations and other terms no matter where you go. The ''Street Fighter'' community (and maybe even the whole of the FGC, excluding ''Smash'') calls the [[Hadoken]] "Fireball", even using it to describe the control motion (i.e., "Fireball forward"). Even then, however, I believe you're also missing the part where "SmashWiki is not official" states to use a name if it's more accepted and it's ''different'' from the official name; a shorthand name is not different. That's why we have a page for [[Knee Smash]] (the official name) and note to the side that it is often shorthandedly referred to as just "the Knee".
| |
| :::That being said, however, I'd 100% be willing to propose that special move names should be the exception to "SmashWiki is not official" (especially given how we already function off of "don't give a move a name if it doesn't have one that isn't commonly accepted")...if it weren't for [[Mega Lucario]] and [[Mega Charizard X]] being different pages. Though, given that we've put [[Zero Laser]] into one page, I don't actually know how much of an issue that would be. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 00:14, September 24, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Making move names (not just special moves; any moves) an exception to the "Smashwiki is not official" rule is a good idea. I wouldn't mind if the two Mega Evolution final smashes were merged into one page named "Mega Evolution" a la Zero Laser. [[Special:Contributions/72.219.72.215|72.219.72.215]] 19:58, September 24, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Vastly disagree with merging the megas. They are different transformations with different data and different uses. Keep them separate. <span style="font-family:Algerian;font-size:10pt;background:#000;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|12px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0">King</span>]]'''</span> 20:04, September 24, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Though Mega Evolution is something they both use, they are different forms classified under the same concept. [[Mega Charizard X]] is not the same as [[Mega Lucario]] or [[Mega Mewtwo Y]]. Not even Charizard Y or Mewtwo X is the same as them or each other. I can see making a new page that explains Mega Evolution separate from the individual forms, but that would possibly be redundant of the Origin section on the page. I can see a page like the one that [[List_of_swords|list the Swords in Smash]] that list all the transformations or alternate forms which would include Giga Bowser, Ganon, Super Dragon, [[Torrential Roar]] (and Corrin's taunts and other attacks), [[Shadow Mario Paint|Shadow Mario ]], Mega Evolution, Ash-Greninja, [[Octopus]], [[Giga Mac]], and possibly even Zelda/Sheik or Samus' old FS, as they all transform during battle. Forms like Vulpix and Alolan Vulpix or the [[Prince of Sablé|Prince]] could even be in a small bullet point subsection like for the non-fighter related Swords on the sword list. It would be a bit of a blurb of what Mega Evolution is and who use it. Even Pokemon have the info tied to the individual Pokemon that it is rather than the transformation that takes place. One is not the other. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:27, September 25, 2020 (EDT)
| |
Log in
