Editing Talk:Forward tilt
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge== | ==Merge== | ||
Why are there articles for [[Strong | Why are there articles for [[Strong Attack]] and [[Strong Side]]? They're obviously the same thing. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 22:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:'''Strong No Merge'''. "Strong Side" is just a name for a tilt (official name or something? I don't know why they aren't "tilts" anymore). Anyway, [[Strong | :'''Strong No Merge'''. "Strong Side" is just a name for a tilt (official name or something? I don't know why they aren't "tilts" anymore). Anyway, [[Strong Up]] and [[Strong Down]] are also [[Strong Attack]]s, so unless we want to merge all the tilt attacks into a single article...[[User:Entrea Sumatae|<span style="color:#4682b4">'''–Entrea Sumatae'''</span>]] 00:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::You know, I'm just removing the tag. I hope you don't mind terribly, but it's like suggesting merging [[Side smash]] with [[Smash | ::You know, I'm just removing the tag. I hope you don't mind terribly, but it's like suggesting merging [[Side smash]] with [[Smash Attack]]. It's just that the Strong Attack article was way too vague to make that fact obvious.[[User:Entrea Sumatae|<span style="color:#4682b4">'''–Entrea Sumatae'''</span>]] 00:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Right, upon further review, that makes sense. This change in terminology from "side" to "tilt" and back again with "strongs" all over the place caught me off guard. :^) --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 22:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | :::Right, upon further review, that makes sense. This change in terminology from "side" to "tilt" and back again with "strongs" all over the place caught me off guard. :^) --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 22:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::You know, maybe they're talking about putting in, for example, <code><nowiki>{{SSBB|Link}}</nowiki></code> as opposed to <code><nowiki>[[Link (SSBB)|Link]]</nowiki></code>. Let me go back and adjust it to that. You may be on to something. [[User:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">Nymbare</span>]] [[User talk:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">and his talk</span>]] 14:19, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | ::You know, maybe they're talking about putting in, for example, <code><nowiki>{{SSBB|Link}}</nowiki></code> as opposed to <code><nowiki>[[Link (SSBB)|Link]]</nowiki></code>. Let me go back and adjust it to that. You may be on to something. [[User:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">Nymbare</span>]] [[User talk:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">and his talk</span>]] 14:19, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::Done with that bit. Now, what of the angling symbols idea? [[User:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">Nymbare</span>]] [[User talk:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">and his talk</span>]] 14:32, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | :::Done with that bit. Now, what of the angling symbols idea? [[User:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">Nymbare</span>]] [[User talk:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">and his talk</span>]] 14:32, 27 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
