| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 37: |
Line 37: |
|
| |
|
| I vote keep. That section isn't speculation, it's explaination, because they definitely use this invisible platform. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 22:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC) | | I vote keep. That section isn't speculation, it's explaination, because they definitely use this invisible platform. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 22:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
| I vote '''delete'''. The very first comment on this page states that we should have an article on how kirby holds items because we don't know how. I have a few questions too. How does link have his bombs inside his shirt? Why don't people die immediately when they get hit by an arrow? Does Luigi get concussions from hitting a wall w/ his green missile? Oh and also a lot of games have double jumps, but we don't care.
| |
|
| |
| Basically...
| |
|
| |
| NO ONE CARES, THESE ARE VIDEO GAMES AND DON'T MESS WITH THE NATURAL ORDER.[[Special:Contributions/75.85.64.155|75.85.64.155]] 11:33, 2 March 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| :How do we know it's a platform? Yes, the special effect looks somewhat like a platform. But it could be a gust of air for all we know. And a good deal of double jump animations don't look like the character is jumping off something. Besides, if we explained double jumps by saying there's an invisible platform, we then have to explain where this platform comes form. | | :How do we know it's a platform? Yes, the special effect looks somewhat like a platform. But it could be a gust of air for all we know. And a good deal of double jump animations don't look like the character is jumping off something. Besides, if we explained double jumps by saying there's an invisible platform, we then have to explain where this platform comes form. |
| Line 49: |
Line 43: |
| OK, you're right, so let'sa add the "this section contains unverified claims" template. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | | OK, you're right, so let'sa add the "this section contains unverified claims" template. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
| :Kid, you were editing smashwiki from ''your phone''? What the hell. Normally, I would think you're in class, but its a sunday so you obviously weren't. Let me give you some advice: Nothing on smashwiki is important enough to merit editing ''with a f&$%ing cell phone''. Just wait till your in front of the computer screen and have a handy thing called the Keyboard, which incidentally has tildes on it. Normally, I would give some long anecdote about how Pope Pius the Second invented the keyboard before selling it to the king of the turks who taught me how to use it, but instead I'll offer up a tip. Instead of editing smashwiki on your phone when you're bored, see if you can download Chip's Challenge. Here's a hint: Chip can't swim without flippers. [[User:13375poolR|13375poolR]] ([[User talk:13375poolR|talk]]) 05:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | | :Kid, you were editing smashwiki from ''your phone''? What the hell. Normally, I would think you're in class, but its a sunday so you obviously weren't. Let me give you some advice: Nothing on smashwiki is important enough to merit editing ''with a f&$%ing cell phone''. Just wait till your in front of the computer screen and have a handy thing called the Keyboard, which incidentally has tildes on it. Normally, I would give some long anecdote about how Pope Pius the Second invented the keyboard before selling it to the king of the turks who taught me how to use it, but instead I'll offer up a tip. Instead of editing smashwiki on your phone when you're bored, see if you can download Chip's Challenge. Here's a hint: Chip can't swim without flippers. [[User:13375poolR|13375poolR]] ([[User talk:13375poolR|talk]]) 05:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
| ::Why are you getting mad over where another user likes to edit. I'm an IP on an iPad and I guarantee you there are others who edit from mobile devices[[Special:Contributions/75.85.64.155|75.85.64.155]] 11:33, 2 March 2014 (EST)
| |
| :My "f&$%ing cell phone" does have a keyboard. It just doesn't have an Option key. By the way: It was monday and I was in the schoolbus. And it wasn't because I was bored but because I had just recieved the change notification. I always check my e-mail after school. Saves time. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | | :My "f&$%ing cell phone" does have a keyboard. It just doesn't have an Option key. By the way: It was monday and I was in the schoolbus. And it wasn't because I was bored but because I had just recieved the change notification. I always check my e-mail after school. Saves time. [[User:Malefix|Malefix]] ([[User talk:Malefix|talk]]) 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
| The ripples that you see are just an effect. It can be changed to many things with project smash attacks. You could make it an explosion, a splash or nothing at all. It is only there for graphic effects.[[User:Highwaypumpy|<span style="color:Orange;">highway</span>]] [[User talk:Highwaypumpy|<span style="color:Red;">pumpy</span>]] <sup><span style="color:Yellow;">[[Special:Contributions/highwaypumpy|sfs</span></sup>]] 19:03, April 2, 2010 (UTC) | | The ripples that you see are just an effect. It can be changed to many things with project smash attacks. You could make it an explosion, a splash or nothing at all. It is only there for graphic effects.[[User:Highwaypumpy|<span style="color:Orange;">highway</span>]] [[User talk:Highwaypumpy|<span style="color:Red;">pumpy</span>]] <sup><span style="color:Yellow;">[[Special:Contributions/highwaypumpy|sfs</span></sup>]] 19:03, April 2, 2010 (UTC) |
| Line 120: |
Line 113: |
| ::::::::::::One term is fitting for the move, the other is used more often (but not to the point where it can be used such see "octopuses" and "octopodes") and has a slightly different definition. I don't know why the "we're using it for a long time without problems" argument is bunk. I don't see how changing something that is correct to something that is used more in colloquial dialogue will fix anything other than a bit more hits in a search engine. [[File:GreenMarioBrawlHead.png|15px]][[User:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#32CD32"> | | ::::::::::::One term is fitting for the move, the other is used more often (but not to the point where it can be used such see "octopuses" and "octopodes") and has a slightly different definition. I don't know why the "we're using it for a long time without problems" argument is bunk. I don't see how changing something that is correct to something that is used more in colloquial dialogue will fix anything other than a bit more hits in a search engine. [[File:GreenMarioBrawlHead.png|15px]][[User:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#32CD32"> |
| Green</span>]] [[User talk:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:#FFA500">Mario</span>]] 13:55, 11 January 2014 (EST) | | Green</span>]] [[User talk:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:#FFA500">Mario</span>]] 13:55, 11 January 2014 (EST) |
| ::::::::::::Excuse the long delay in response, I got caught up in other things this weekend.
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::Anyway, "midair jump" is objectively superior, because ''it fully and accurately describes what the action is'' (being a jump in '''midair'''), while "double jump" insinuates that it's the second jump the character performs in succession, which is not the case and can be downright inaccurate (being that characters don't need to perform the first jump to perform it, and the fact there are multiple characters with multiple midair jumps). It really doesn't get more simple than that. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:07, 13 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::::::"Double jump" also "fully and accurately describes what the action is" if you've ever played any video game with the action ever before. Language evolves to suit usage, not the other way around (as sad as that is, it's still true).
| |
| :::::::::::::Green Mario: The majority of arguments involving something like "it's how we've always done it, so don't change it" don't really address the debate itself unless it can be demonstrated that there's an advantage in leaving things unchanged. In this case, I believe I have sufficiently demonstrated that the two terms are functionally identical to our target audience, one of the two terms has an extreme edge in common usage, and the effort required to make the change would be minimal; I believe this outstrips any minor advantage in not changing it. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Engineer 13:46, 13 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::Other video games may use the term, but again, other games are irrelevant, and it simply does not work that way for Smash. Quite frankly, other games should follow the Smash's term usage and start calling them "midair jumps", unless they're explicitly the second jump the character performs.
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::::I can't explain it any simpler than I already have; "midair jump" implies a jump in midair, "double jump" implies the second jump in succession, and the technique here is quite certainly the former, especially for characters with multiple midair jumps. Why are you being dense about this?
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::::What makes a name the best name for a technique? ''A simple and intuitive name that fully describes the action as best as possible and that people can readily understand.'' An example of a good technique name would be pivot grab (a grab you perform while turning around). What is this technique? "A jump you perform in '''midair'''", not "the second jump you perform". And again, the characters with multiple jumps, it does not make any sense to say Kirby has "five double jumps" instead of "five midair jumps".
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::::I hate to keep repeating arguments, but you're not refuting them, and instead just keep going back to an [http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-popularity.html appeal to popularity]. When we use the common term, it's when the official term is near nonexistent in usage, and when the official term is decidedly inferior/more complicated/unintuitive. Here, midair jump is not pretty much unknown and never used like ukemi and prat falling are, nor is it an inferior/more complicated/unintuitive name (which as I shown over and over, is the opposite).
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::::"''The majority of arguments involving something like "it's how we've always done it, so don't change it" don't really address the debate itself unless it can be demonstrated that there's an advantage in leaving things unchanged.''"
| |
|
| |
| ::::::::::::::There's need to be a greater demonstrateable advantage to changing things. Quite simply, your case to change "midair jump" to "double jump" is not strong, when your entire argument is an appeal to popularity. You're not showing any actual advantage is using "double jump" to "midair jump" except that "more smashers and games use it", when I demonstrated ''repeatedly'' on how midair jump is the better term for us to use and does not leave people feeling "unfamiliar", especially for encyclopedic purposes (again, saying "Kirby has five double jumps" is just plain stupid). <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:57, 14 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::::::::You didn't even get the fallacy right; it's [http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-common-practice.html appearl to common practice], not appeal to popularity. Though I guess you can say it's both, since "double jump" is both the popular choice and the common practice.
| |
| :::::::::::::::That aside, if you're going to say my argument is fallacious, then look at your own. Your fundamental argument is "it's a better name". [http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-authority.html Who decides what's a better name]? We have no authority to decide on what's "better", '''we report on what people use'''. [[SW:OFFICIAL]] spells it out: '''Do use the name that is most commonly accepted. If two terms are equally used, be consistent.''' It is blatantly clear that one term vastly overpowers the other in usage in both the Smash Bros. community and in gaming in general. I don't particularily care whether it's "right", "wrong", "more correct", or whatever. I care that we follow our own damn rules.
| |
| :::::::::::::::Now let's both of us shut up and let other users give their opinion. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Non-Toxic 13:33, 14 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::::::::Oh yeah one other thing I forgot to note. Look at the page history and you'll see that this was originally at "double jump", but was then moved to "midair jump" explicitly because that was the official name from the DOJO!!, which quite obviously is the exact opposite of what the policy says to do and probably only happened because the policy didn't exist at the time. So no, this is not a battle between two unofficial terms, it is between an official one and a more widely-used unofficial one (hey, where have we seen that before?). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Victorious 13:57, 14 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::Rules don't always get the final say. Sometimes, common sense triumphs. '''I''' care when it's correct rather than misleading. As Omega Tyrant continues to assert, "Quite simply, your case to change "midair jump" to "double jump" is not strong, when your entire argument is an appeal to popularity." and that's all I'm seeing in your arguments. Your only back-up is "it's the rules". Don't live by the rules. [[File:GreenMarioBrawlHead.png|15px]][[User:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#32CD32">Green</span>]] [[User talk:Green Mario|<span style="font-family:Papyrus;color:#FFA500">Mario</span>]] 16:13, 14 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| <small>(resetting indent)</small> To take a different angle on this whole shabang, compare "midair jump" vs "double jump" to "ukemi" vs "tech". Both pairs are an unpopular official term that is more semantically valid versus a widely-used unofficial term common to several other games and used as the base for several technique names (like "edgetech" or "double jump cancel"). To someone who knows nothing of Smash Bros., "midair jump" and "double jump" are equally meaningful, while "ukemi" and "tech" are equally meaningless. The only difference is that this page was moved to the official term with nothing but "it's official" as justification (and was somehow ignored or forgotten about even after SW:OFFICIAL came to pass), whereas "tech" has been firmly rooted as the primary for our entire existence even without SW:OFFICIAL (as far as I'm aware). How is this move any different than a theoretical moving of "ukemi" to "tech"? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] Le Grand Fromage 20:27, 14 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :Well? Is no one capable of arguing this point, or was it just forgotten about? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Engineer 15:40, 22 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| ::I'm waiting to see if anyone can refute this. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Bold 17:47, 28 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :::Both of you had good, solid reasons to support your ideas. I most certainly can't speak for all of the users of Smash Wiki, but I'm guessing that a lot of people have read your debates and have no idea which side to support. That's how I feel anyway. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:blue">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:blue">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 18:52, 28 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| On a completely irrelevant note, why does the main article link to the lowercase "jump", but the talk page of the lowercase "jump" redirects to the capitalized "Jump?" The talk page should be moved to the lowercase "jump", or the talk pages should not redirect to each other. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 18:45, 11 January 2014 (EST)
| |
| :Yeah that should be fixed (probably once this discussion is over so a double move isn't needed). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Engineer 13:46, 13 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| <br />Just to throw my thoughts in... I do believe "double jump" is more relatable and easier to say compared to "midair jump", despite being technically wrong for reasons stated above. Don't get me wrong here: midair jump sounds better to me because it is proper (and I am proper as you'll see soon). This case to me is just like how many people use palette swap (or people using recolor as a term for an outfit) for '''altered textures on 3D models of all things.''' I don't approve of that at all and I honestly cringe hearing people use those words interchangeably. Calling an outfit by a specific color like Falco's green outfit/color is not what bothers me; it is people using terminology for 2D graphics for 3D, and oftentimes poorly at that. It is not my place to change such terms used universally on here however, so I don't.<br />
| |
| Back on subject: It's not that big of a deal because a double jump's general definition in video games is the jump in mid-air. We should still be wary of how we use such a term for characters discernibly. Because [[SW:OFFICIAL|Smash Wiki says it is not official]], there is no reason to let this affect our personal vocabulary for the game. [[User:Dragon5|Dragon5]] ([[User talk:Dragon5|talk]]) 18:50, 28 January 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I OPPOSE. Because midair jump includes all characters that can jump more than two times. Plus, midair jump seems to fit more than double jump. [[User:Smashdude10|Smashdude10]] ([[User talk:Smashdude10|talk]]) 19:58, 12 February 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == New section just to make editing easier ==
| |
|
| |
| So I'm still not done with this, and I don't yet feel like [[wikipedia:WP:BOLD|being bold]], [[wikipedia:WP:IAR|pulling rank]], and just moving it anyway. There is no advantage to keeping this titled as a term that can be proven is inferior in usage, which is explicitly the metric to how we name such pages. Also see my above spiel asking why this is considered different than "tech" vs "ukemi". [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomprehensible 23:34, 27 February 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Still in '''support''' of moving to double jump. Nobody says "midair jump." You literally hear people say "Jigglypuff's third double jump." Wikis are based on the language used, not what should be technically used because it's more correct. I.e., a wiki is a derivative of the culture it documents, not the other way around. Double jump is the term used. Midair jump is also correct but never really heard. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 20:49, 2 March 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Bump. Can we just move it yet. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 18:30, 8 March 2014 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' for moving to Double Jump. Like Toomai and Ryxis said, its the more common term to use and Midair Jump is the lesser used one. I think quantity is better than quality this time. If no one opposes in a week, I'm automatically moving this. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Link OoT Dots.PNG|16px]] The Solid Snake 11:10, 11 March 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Origin section ==
| |
|
| |
| In which games do Mario and Luigi double jump? – [[User:Smiddle|Smiddle]] 13:46, 12 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :In most core Mario games, the terms "double jump" and "triple jump" are used to refer to "when you land on the ground, jump again to go higher", as opposed to "jump while in the air", which I don't think anyone playable other than Yoshi has ever been capable of doing (aside from gimmicks like the Cosmic Spin). So I don't really think it's an applicable origin for them. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Brazen 14:12, 12 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::Pretty much, the similarity is in name only. – [[User:Smiddle|Smiddle]] 02:52, 13 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
Log in
