Editing Talk:2020 Super Smash Bros. sexual misconduct allegations
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Presumed typo== | |||
The phrase "being manipulating[sic] by minors" appears to be a typo that needs to be corrected to "manipulating minors", both from the context of the sentence and because I presume this wiki's not in the habit of offering the standard pedophile excuse—that the minor who was assaulted had manipulated the pedophile into the act, even though minors are legally incapable of consent in the first place. [[User:AlteredBest|AlteredBest]] ([[User talk:AlteredBest|talk]]) 11:37, January 1, 2025 (EST) | |||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion== | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
:'''Agree Rather Strongly'''. As someone pointed over a year ago, the article is poorly worded with regards to hindsight, using language like "Jisu, one of the victims of ZeRo" for example, showing a particular bias towards a situation that is still left to be validated. The issue here in particular is that a significant portion of the allegations ''were'' proven to be valid, so treating unresolved cases in the same light throws the entirety of the page's honesty into question. I'm also not sure what the purpose of quoting Leffen in the same paragraph as the quote aforementioned is, especially considering that he himself is a polarizing figure. I don't think its totally invalid to include his statement, but its framed in a particular way that shows a lot of bias towards one side of the story. - <span style="color: indigo;">'''Saxon'''</span><span style="color: green;">'''The'''</span><span style="color: indigo;">'''Dan'''</span> 02:46, January 16, 2022 (EST) | :'''Agree Rather Strongly'''. As someone pointed over a year ago, the article is poorly worded with regards to hindsight, using language like "Jisu, one of the victims of ZeRo" for example, showing a particular bias towards a situation that is still left to be validated. The issue here in particular is that a significant portion of the allegations ''were'' proven to be valid, so treating unresolved cases in the same light throws the entirety of the page's honesty into question. I'm also not sure what the purpose of quoting Leffen in the same paragraph as the quote aforementioned is, especially considering that he himself is a polarizing figure. I don't think its totally invalid to include his statement, but its framed in a particular way that shows a lot of bias towards one side of the story. - <span style="color: indigo;">'''Saxon'''</span><span style="color: green;">'''The'''</span><span style="color: indigo;">'''Dan'''</span> 02:46, January 16, 2022 (EST) | ||
:'''Strong support'''. There's a whole lot that's going on, even now, with a notable example being ZeRo's lawsuits against Jisu, ongoing as of this post. With over 100 people named in the 2020 allegations, there is plenty going on that we could be documenting here. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] the 🦊[[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry''']]🐺. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 03:27, January 16, 2022 (EST) | :'''Strong support'''. There's a whole lot that's going on, even now, with a notable example being ZeRo's lawsuits against Jisu, ongoing as of this post. With over 100 people named in the 2020 allegations, there is plenty going on that we could be documenting here. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] the 🦊[[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry''']]🐺. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 03:27, January 16, 2022 (EST) | ||