[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
SmashWiki talk:Ownership: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Neutral== | ==Neutral== | ||
*'''Neutral leaning towards support'''. I think some of the wording should be a little more firm before we pass this, especially for userpages. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 00:14, 28 June 2017 (EDT) | |||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
Revision as of 00:15, June 28, 2017
Support
- Support, as nom.
- Full support this has been an issue for too long. A policy set in place will, if nothing else, give us something to point to when smashers get confused as to why their own page isn't up to their discretion. Serpent
King 01:51, 26 June 2017 (EDT) - Support Parroting Serpent. This will definitely paint a clearer picture as to how people should treat their own smasher articles, especially a select few people...not pointing any fingers... Disaster Flare
(talk) 01:52, 26 June 2017 (EDT) - Support, honestly I'm surprised it's taken this long for such a policy to be realized. Alex Parpotta (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
- Support. No additional comment. MHStarCraft
10:37, 26 June 2017 (EDT) - Support. How was this not one of the first policies on this site? -- Her Majesty, Queen Junko, 13:49, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
- Support. I think the Rauquaza07 situation sums up why this is a useful policy. BSTIK (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
- Support I don't see any issues. SmashWiki has long had conflict of interest issues and this will set in stone that such edits are unacceptable. RoyboyX Talk 16:57, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
- Total support. I've had my share of bouncing conflict of interest edits, and in fact, one of the examples provided were done by me. It would be great if we had a clear set of rules outlining what people can and can't do. We should also have rules against 'owners' pretending they are not, just so they can write what they want and nobody will take a second look! Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 20:42, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Neutral leaning towards support. I think some of the wording should be a little more firm before we pass this, especially for userpages.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 00:14, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
