User talk:TheNuttyOne/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Line 109: Line 109:
*"undoing an undo after providing enough evidence"- I saw 0 evidence in this case
*"undoing an undo after providing enough evidence"- I saw 0 evidence in this case
*"generally fine, and that is what I did"- AKA it benefits you. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 20:10, 13 February 2016 (EST)
*"generally fine, and that is what I did"- AKA it benefits you. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 20:10, 13 February 2016 (EST)
:*It's also not written in the policy that you can't open a discussion the next day, yet you seem to enforce that pretty hard. It's not written in the policy that you can permaban an IP if they are a 5-time repeat offender, yet Miles did that.
:*You saw 0 evidence ''that you agreed with''. I saw 0 evidence that I agreed with when you added the tag back twice. But I did state why it should be okay, which in previous cases is appropriate.
:*That... is a completely false and ridiculous-sounding "AKA". "generally fine" = whenever someone else does it, no one argues (digging through contributions to try to find examples). "that is what I did" = well, literally I did what I had seen happen in the past and be fine and figured it was fine here too. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="magenta">cupid♥</font>]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  20:14, 13 February 2016 (EST)