2,494
edits
SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Miles of SmashWiki: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Miles of SmashWiki (edit)
Revision as of 06:29, November 15, 2015
, 9 years ago→Oppose
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→Oppose) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
#'''Strong Oppose''' I read all the comments in oppose section and some of your talk page response. This is why I have to reconsider it and agree with opponents. Few supporters seems to say something that is somewhat meaningless. Otherwise, anyone would support him and say "why not we need more" or other negligible things. I haven't seen signs of improving. The fact that you are shutting down your opponents with your positional power, is more of obsessed with winning with reasons. I don't want to see any conspiracy of this wiki. Even you have a lot experience with it, you have another long way to go to correct your core problems. Near my conclusion, I think that you don't deserve being promoted to Bureaucracy in my eyes. The dreams of becoming a bureaucratic will go up in smoke and become an illusion. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:35, 15 November 2015 (EST) | #'''Strong Oppose''' I read all the comments in oppose section and some of your talk page response. This is why I have to reconsider it and agree with opponents. Few supporters seems to say something that is somewhat meaningless. Otherwise, anyone would support him and say "why not we need more" or other negligible things. I haven't seen signs of improving. The fact that you are shutting down your opponents with your positional power, is more of obsessed with winning with reasons. I don't want to see any conspiracy of this wiki. Even you have a lot experience with it, you have another long way to go to correct your core problems. Near my conclusion, I think that you don't deserve being promoted to Bureaucracy in my eyes. The dreams of becoming a bureaucratic will go up in smoke and become an illusion. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:35, 15 November 2015 (EST) | ||
#'''Oppose...?''' I regret saying this: from reading the opposition comments of Omega and 15DollarsWentSouth, I can agree that you don't have the right amount of responsibility to gain bureaucracy, since you don't seem to stop disputes and arguments frequently compared to other lower-ranked users (my buddy [[User:Disaster Flare|Disaster Flare]] went and solved [[User_talk:Drilly_Dilly/Archive_1#Two_things_you_need_to_check_out.|this here ugly situation between me and the guy I can't stand]]; you also didn't respond to [[User_talk:Serpent_King/Archive_3#Toon_Link|this dispute]] in time and posted your comment very late); in other words, I very seldom see you post on a user talk page that solves an argument between at least two users, and even if you do, it's just one or few comments, and then the next we know, you're gone, and the argument fails to cease at that moment. I can agree with everybody else (especially Omega) that you need to do more than just blocking vandals to earn bureaucracy power, despite how I think you're very good at spotting violators and ending their plots to screw this wiki up (don't argue, Omega). While I don't think you're a bad admin (if you read this, please contain yourself, Omega), I can agree with everybody else that you still need to improve on arbitration (ending arguments and debates), since you don't seem to notice disputes that much and how other users (like Disaster Flare) handle them way more often, though I do understand that at certain moments, you're busy with other stuff, along with Nyargleblargle, and I can respect that. Luckily for you, this bureaucracy request is going better than when you were Miles.oppenheimer. - [[User:Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: blue">'''Drilly'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: red">'''the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Drilly Dilly|<span style="color: purple">'''Hedgehog'''</span>]] 03:38, 15 November 2015 (EST) | #'''Oppose...?''' I regret saying this: from reading the opposition comments of Omega and 15DollarsWentSouth, I can agree that you don't have the right amount of responsibility to gain bureaucracy, since you don't seem to stop disputes and arguments frequently compared to other lower-ranked users (my buddy [[User:Disaster Flare|Disaster Flare]] went and solved [[User_talk:Drilly_Dilly/Archive_1#Two_things_you_need_to_check_out.|this here ugly situation between me and the guy I can't stand]]; you also didn't respond to [[User_talk:Serpent_King/Archive_3#Toon_Link|this dispute]] in time and posted your comment very late); in other words, I very seldom see you post on a user talk page that solves an argument between at least two users, and even if you do, it's just one or few comments, and then the next we know, you're gone, and the argument fails to cease at that moment. I can agree with everybody else (especially Omega) that you need to do more than just blocking vandals to earn bureaucracy power, despite how I think you're very good at spotting violators and ending their plots to screw this wiki up (don't argue, Omega). While I don't think you're a bad admin (if you read this, please contain yourself, Omega), I can agree with everybody else that you still need to improve on arbitration (ending arguments and debates), since you don't seem to notice disputes that much and how other users (like Disaster Flare) handle them way more often, though I do understand that at certain moments, you're busy with other stuff, along with Nyargleblargle, and I can respect that. Luckily for you, this bureaucracy request is going better than when you were Miles.oppenheimer. - [[User:Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: blue">'''Drilly'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: red">'''the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Drilly Dilly|<span style="color: purple">'''Hedgehog'''</span>]] 03:38, 15 November 2015 (EST) | ||
#'''Strong Oppose''': From the time I've been here on Smash Wiki, you've seemed to commit blunder after blunder with user interactions, while rarely learning from your mistakes, and rarely admitting that you're wrong. Your feedback page seems to do very little to support you actually actively trying to fix your shortcomings, and if you paid attention to the survey that Toomai conducted a while ago, you'd know what the userbase thought of you and tried to fix those problems in a more direct way, instead of having to make ''another'' feedback page where people have to directly call you out before you even consider any sort of action. You push for policies based on your opinions and are quick to dismiss users who have a different opinion than yourself, despite said opinions being founded on unsound assumptions about ''Smash'' and its competitive community, and think that we can sugarcoat extreme facts in a way that removes legitimate information from pages and backs widespread misguided views about characters' viability. Sorry, but in my eyes, you're far from ready for this position. An admin who can't even argue with normal users effectively has no business policing other admins. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 05:29, 15 November 2015 (EST) | |||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||