5,663
edits
User talk:Toomai/Archive 14: Difference between revisions
→Is Luigi still a semi-clone of Mario, or not?
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
:--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 20:36, 25 October 2014 (EDT) | :--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 20:36, 25 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
::(I'm typing this as I think, so it continues changing theories. That's how I work though, so deal with it.) I can't entirely call you biased since you never truly argued. Although I'm clearly biased, I honestly think 35% is rather low. This is probably going to be shot down for being pompous and dense, but I think the numbers would be better off as 75% and higher for full clones with 50%-75% for semi-clones. From OT's testing, all Melee clones are above 75% except Captain Falcon and Ganondorf, but since they're clearly designed as full clones, perhaps 60% should be the limit just to keep them in, in which case a better number for semi-clones would be 40%, or as low as 35% (the latter of which would keep Luigi in the semi-clone range in Brawl and SSB4). If the semi-clone range is 40%, Fox/Falco and Link/Toon Link would still be semi-clones in Brawl, but Falcon/Ganon and Mario/Luigi would not (which would also make them non-clones in Smash 4 as well). If it is 35%, this makes Mario/Luigi semi-clones in Brawl and Smash 4, but Falcon/Ganon still aren't. Thoughts on these numbers? <small>''---Previously unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]]'' </small> 20:53, 25 October 2014 (EDT) | |||