Talk:Warlock Punch: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(→‎Proof: new section)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


Can somebody prove that last bit of trivia?  '''[[User:Cheezperson|<span style="color:gold">Cheez</span><span style="color:red">person</span>]]''' {[[User talk:Cheezperson|<span style="color:steelblue">talk</span>]]}[[Special:Contributions/Cheezperson|<span style="color:silver">stuff</span>]]''' 00:09, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Can somebody prove that last bit of trivia?  '''[[User:Cheezperson|<span style="color:gold">Cheez</span><span style="color:red">person</span>]]''' {[[User talk:Cheezperson|<span style="color:steelblue">talk</span>]]}[[Special:Contributions/Cheezperson|<span style="color:silver">stuff</span>]]''' 00:09, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
== Perused the General Overview ==
Ye all are right about the extreme difficulty off performing an aerial Reverse Warlock Punch. I just think it's flat-out impossible to do in a standard match. The way I see it, you'd have to play a Bunny Light Brawl to make it more possible to accomplish this. A Sacred Combo is '''impossible''' with Warlock Punch, so you can forget it. Not that I like Ganondorf, or any other Legend of Zelda character for that matter, sug, but I'm pretty interested in what attacks and attributes thereof they have to offer. Bottom line: anything that is extremely difficult = impossible to perform! [[User:Lili Rochefort 1965|Lili Rochefort 1965]] ([[User talk:Lili Rochefort 1965|talk]]) 17:51, 30 December 2010 (EST)
:Reverse aerial Warlock Punch is possible to land without items, higher platforms, or physic changes with the [[Flight of Ganon]] (though precise timing is required). But its practicality is questionable. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 19:33, 30 December 2010 (EST)
:Talk pages are not for expressing your opinion of the subject. They are to only be used for discussing ways to improve the article. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 23:27, 5 January 2011 (EST)
::It is, eh? My apologies, hun. Thanks for reminding me; I'm new at this sort of thing. [[User:Lili Rochefort 1965|Lili Rochefort 1965]] ([[User talk:Lili Rochefort 1965|talk]]) 16:37, 7 January 2011 (EST)