613
edits
SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 23:05, January 31, 2011
, 14 years ago→The state of RfRs: +support having requests for rollback
SuperHamster (talk | contribs) (→The state of RfRs: +support having requests for rollback) |
|||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
'''Support''' Every user may have some slip-ups with this (I know I did), but I think they'll quickly learn how to use the tool properly. -[[User:Ivy73|<span style="color:forestgreen">Ivy</span>]][[User talk:Ivy73|<span style="color:blue">73</span>]][[File:002MS.png]] 22:03, 31 January 2011 (EST) | '''Support''' Every user may have some slip-ups with this (I know I did), but I think they'll quickly learn how to use the tool properly. -[[User:Ivy73|<span style="color:forestgreen">Ivy</span>]][[User talk:Ivy73|<span style="color:blue">73</span>]][[File:002MS.png]] 22:03, 31 January 2011 (EST) | ||
'''Support''' having requests for rollback - I agree that it is a tool that may not be as helpful as it is on, say, Wikipedia, but it does still come in handy in the rarer cases where one finds themselves staring at vandalism. I agree with Miles that if someone doesn't want more users with rollback privileges at a certain time, that they can express their opposition at a RfR. I don't find the chance of misused rollbacking to be high, as hopefully, the process of RfR would stop any abusers and people with a lack of experience. Accidents, however, definitely do happen - I've accidentally clicked the rollback button one too many times on Wikipedia. But mistakes are just as easily fixable as they are done, so I feel that the accidents don't outweigh giving users rollback privileges. <b>~<i>[[User:SuperHamster|<font color="#07517C">Super</font>]]</i>[[User:SuperHamster|<font color="#6FA23B">Hamster</font>]]</b> <small>[[User talk:SuperHamster|Talk]]</small> 22:05, 31 January 2011 (EST) | |||