62
edits
SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Charitwo: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship/Charitwo (edit)
Revision as of 00:53, September 7, 2008
, 16 years ago→Additional beneficial (but not required) traits
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) m (I do not, in any way, support Charitwo's nomination.) |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<s>From what I can tell, Charitwo seems like the best candidate available. If Charitwo thinks he fulfills these criteria then I'd be happy to support him as a bureaucrat.</s> --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 03:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | <s>From what I can tell, Charitwo seems like the best candidate available. If Charitwo thinks he fulfills these criteria then I'd be happy to support him as a bureaucrat.</s> --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 03:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I retract my support and '''strongly oppose''' Charitwo's request for bureaucratship. This user needs a serious attitude change; [[User_talk:Charitwo#New_admin-related_implementations|this]] is nothing but unacceptable. Charitwo does not seem to understand that holding a sysop position does not make him any different than other users. "You are an editor, focus on content please." ...What the fuck? So once you're promoted to sysop you're free to ignore contributing to content and edit whatever the hell you please, but normal users are restricted to mainspace? I don't think so. Charitwo also denies the need for consensus and refused to undo his non-consensus-backed edits even when pointed out to him. Again, wtf? If this kind of action is what he deems acceptable when he's a sysop, I shudder to think what kind of tyrannical edits he may make when he's a bureaucrat, especially when this is no more than a non-critical issue. It is, frankly, quite scary. If he deems polite suggestions and requests harassment, then it is very clear Charitwo is unfit to be a bureaucrat of this wiki. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 02:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | :I retract my support and '''strongly oppose''' Charitwo's request for bureaucratship. This user needs a serious attitude change; [[User_talk:Charitwo#New_admin-related_implementations|this]] is nothing but unacceptable. Charitwo does not seem to understand that holding a sysop position does not make him any different than other users. "You are an editor, focus on content please." ...What the fuck? So once you're promoted to sysop you're free to ignore contributing to content and edit whatever the hell you please, but normal users are restricted to mainspace? I don't think so. Charitwo also denies the need for consensus and refused to undo his non-consensus-backed edits even when pointed out to him. Again, wtf? If this kind of action is what he deems acceptable when he's a sysop, I shudder to think what kind of tyrannical edits he may make when he's a bureaucrat, especially when this is no more than a non-critical issue. It is, frankly, quite scary. If he deems polite suggestions and requests harassment, then it is very clear Charitwo is unfit to be a bureaucrat of this wiki. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 02:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Finally lost your cool? Well, for the record, I'm impressed. Jolly good show, though. All the best, [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 04:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||