2,149
edits
(→Re-opening: new section) |
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) m (→Re-opening) |
||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
Now I know that I made a recommendation above that was, well, ... really stupid. Nevertheless, I would like to know what would have to change before the RfA's are reopened. I hate to beat a dead horse like this, but there should at least be some criteria to be satisfied before they reopen. {[[User:Miles.oppenheimer|My name is Miles,]] [[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|and I approve]] [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|this message.]]} 20:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | Now I know that I made a recommendation above that was, well, ... really stupid. Nevertheless, I would like to know what would have to change before the RfA's are reopened. I hate to beat a dead horse like this, but there should at least be some criteria to be satisfied before they reopen. {[[User:Miles.oppenheimer|My name is Miles,]] [[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|and I approve]] [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|this message.]]} 20:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think anything needs to change, because (imo) they should have never closed in the first place. My 2 cents. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">Shadow</font>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">crest</font>]]</font> 20:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC) |
edits