3,359
edits
Forum:Attempt to fix the Notable Players sections number 2: Difference between revisions
Forum:Attempt to fix the Notable Players sections number 2 (edit)
Revision as of 17:21, March 24, 2021
, 4 years ago→Oppose
MemeDedede (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
MemeDedede (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
#'''Soft oppose''' I agree with most of the ideas behind this but I do feel this is too black and white of a take. I'm open to reconsidering and thing OT did a great job with this. But for now I don't back the policy. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 17:18, March 24, 2021 (EDT) | #'''Soft oppose''' I agree with most of the ideas behind this but I do feel this is too black and white of a take. I'm open to reconsidering and thing OT did a great job with this. But for now I don't back the policy. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 17:18, March 24, 2021 (EDT) | ||
#'''Soft oppose''': Agreeing with wiifitkid on this. Most of the notable players sections are fine the way they are, though I would be open for similar ideas. Right now I'd probably be focusing more on international players, as they have significant impacts overseas as well. | #'''Soft oppose''': Agreeing with wiifitkid on this. Most of the notable players sections are fine the way they are, though I would be open for similar ideas. Right now I'd probably be focusing more on international players, as they have significant impacts overseas as well. | ||
[[User:MemeDedede|MemeDedede]] ([[User talk:MemeDedede|talk]]) 17:21, March 24, 2021 (EDT) | |||
===Neutral=== | ===Neutral=== | ||