Editing Smasher talk:Mew2King
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
*We keep the controversies at MLG and ROM 5 that actually happened with factual explanations. We've already removed a lot of the anti-M2K bias that was present before. | *We keep the controversies at MLG and ROM 5 that actually happened with factual explanations. We've already removed a lot of the anti-M2K bias that was present before. | ||
*The trip to Japan section is still questionable. | *The trip to Japan section is still questionable. | ||
*The last section has ''nothing but good things to say'' about how Mew2King has improved his character, and about his sponsorship | *The last section has ''nothing but good things to say'' about how Mew2King has improved his character, and about his sponsorship. | ||
Besides the aforementioned single section that's debatable, I don't know what else we can do. The section is far less biased (if at all), removing speculation, personal viewpoints, and other nasty things that users have written in the past from the picture. It owes up to what mistakes he made, what was behind those mistakes, and how he improved. Having a controversy section in itself is not our attempt to intentionally defame Mew2King. Any more things to add? --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (EDT) | Besides the aforementioned single section that's debatable, I don't know what else we can do. The section is far less biased (if at all), removing speculation, personal viewpoints, and other nasty things that users have written in the past from the picture. It owes up to what mistakes he made, what was behind those mistakes, and how he improved. Having a controversy section in itself is not our attempt to intentionally defame Mew2King. Any more things to add? --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
