| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 53: |
Line 53: |
|
| |
|
| If I went off in the wrong direction for what you wanted to discuss, by all means set me straight, but if you want to change the policy you might want to try avoiding looking at this one specific leak (because it may restrict our perspective). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomprehensible 19:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | If I went off in the wrong direction for what you wanted to discuss, by all means set me straight, but if you want to change the policy you might want to try avoiding looking at this one specific leak (because it may restrict our perspective). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomprehensible 19:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :<s>Did we create pages for fighters implicated in the Gematsu leak when it first surfaced? We never did until they were officially confirmed. This case should be no different.</s> [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:16, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | :Did we create pages for fighters implicated in the Gematsu leak when it first surfaced? We never did until they were officially confirmed. This case should be no different. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:16, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| ::Except this time, there is evidence in the form of a video. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 19:19, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::Except this time, there is evidence in the form of a video. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 19:19, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :::<s>True, but we need to consider the chance that texture hacks and other types of video setup to create the footage were involved.</s> [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:27, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | :::True, but we need to consider the chance that texture hacks and other types of video setup to create the footage were involved. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:27, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| ::::If you've found evidence that those characters are Brawl hacks, then by all means, please show. --<span style="background-color: black; border:3px solid blue; border-radius:10px 30px 30px 10px;">[[User:Lasifer|Lasifer]]</span> [[File:MaskedManSignatureSprite.PNG|link=User talk:Lasifer]] 19:36, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::::If you've found evidence that those characters are Brawl hacks, then by all means, please show. --<span style="background-color: black; border:3px solid blue; border-radius:10px 30px 30px 10px;">[[User:Lasifer|Lasifer]]</span> [[File:MaskedManSignatureSprite.PNG|link=User talk:Lasifer]] 19:36, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| ::::We drew a specific line, which this leak has now crossed. I've seen no evidence to support the claim of Shulk or Bowser Jr.'s gameplay being Brawl hacks. If you have such evidence, feel free to share it. As it stands, though, this leak has met our standards for legitimacy by providing clear and unambiguous video. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:40, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::::We drew a specific line, which this leak has now crossed. I've seen no evidence to support the claim of Shulk or Bowser Jr.'s gameplay being Brawl hacks. If you have such evidence, feel free to share it. As it stands, though, this leak has met our standards for legitimacy by providing clear and unambiguous video. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:40, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :::::<s>Had to wait until I got home from classes. Anyways, [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gxj7nzpHK2I compare Shulk's movements] with [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FWdSR_nMryA Marth or Roy's movements] (Project M footage). Notice any similarities? Also, Shulk's voice may be taken directly from Xenoblade Chronicles.</s> [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:57, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | :::::Had to wait until I got home from classes. Anyways, [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gxj7nzpHK2I compare Shulk's movements] with [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FWdSR_nMryA Marth or Roy's movements] (Project M footage). Notice any similarities? Also, Shulk's voice may be taken directly from Xenoblade Chronicles. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 19:57, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| ::::::There are some minor similarities, although it doesn't explain the constant equipping and dequipping of the Monado (note how often it ends up on Shulk's back). Also, Smash reusing sound clips is very possible, but since Shulk's VA implied he worked on something big it could very well be new recordings of the same lines. On top of that, there's still the matter of Bowser Jr. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::::::There are some minor similarities, although it doesn't explain the constant equipping and dequipping of the Monado (note how often it ends up on Shulk's back). Also, Smash reusing sound clips is very possible, but since Shulk's VA implied he worked on something big it could very well be new recordings of the same lines. On top of that, there's still the matter of Bowser Jr. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :::::::I'm back from Tae-Kwon-Do. Also, there is the fact that Dr. Mario, Lucina and Dark Pit being separated from there franchise and being grouped together as "clones". Sakurai wouldn't emphasize the flaw of having clones. When he explained Lucina's clone status, he gave her an excuse for being separate from Marth. And why is Yoshi in the middle of the Mario characters if Smash considers him from his own series? And doesn't Ganondorf's head look like an inverted Twilight Princess artwork? I know Lucina has the same pose as her masked artwork from Awakening, but would they really be uncreative with poses? [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 20:38, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | :::::::I'm back from Tae-Kwon-Do. Also, there is the fact that Dr. Mario, Lucina and Dark Pit being separated from there franchise and being grouped together as "clones". Sakurai wouldn't emphasize the flaw of having clones. When he explained Lucina's clone status, he gave her an excuse for being separate from Marth. And why is Yoshi in the middle of the Mario characters if Smash considers him from his own series? And doesn't Ganondorf's head look like an inverted Twilight Princess artwork? I know Lucina has the same pose as her masked artwork from Awakening, but would they really be uncreative with poses? [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 20:38, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| Line 68: |
Line 68: |
| :::::::::::Oh, the leaker has been sued? And maybe Sakurai would probably change up some stuff to punish the leaker even more. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 21:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | :::::::::::Oh, the leaker has been sued? And maybe Sakurai would probably change up some stuff to punish the leaker even more. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 21:03, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| ::::::::::::What are you getting at? [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 21:07, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::::::::::::What are you getting at? [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 21:07, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :::::::::::::That was just a rumor. There is no proof that the leaker ever had contact with NoA. --[[Special:Contributions/108.31.78.204|108.31.78.204]] 22:25, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| <small>(reset indent)</small> I will repeat. We're only discussing the videos here, not the screenshots. Unless you can decisively prove the videos are fakes at this point, the fact that the evidence meets this policy will continue to have us treat them as legitimate. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:18, 25 August 2014 (EDT) | | <small>(reset indent)</small> I will repeat. We're only discussing the videos here, not the screenshots. Unless you can decisively prove the videos are fakes at this point, the fact that the evidence meets this policy will continue to have us treat them as legitimate. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:18, 25 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :We shouldn't have to prove the videos are false- they have to prove that they're true by virtue of their own improbable claims. The burden of proof lies with the leaker, not the editors of the wiki. The policy is too soft on videos right now- an unauthorized video should be verified by at least one additional independent source before being considered to be truthful, or at least get the same amount of scrutiny as a screenshot. So far, there is no piece of evidence (official or not) that can determine if the supposed newcomers will even be in the game, and I would prefer to assume it's false and add them back in later than assume they're true and damage the wiki's credibility. If nothing else, the leaked characters should be put in an "unconfirmed" section, inasmuch as they have not in fact been confirmed yet. --[[Special:Contributions/108.31.78.204|108.31.78.204]] 22:25, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::Exactly. In fact, I'm hoping for tomorrow's pic of the day to disprove something in the video. Maybe make Bowser Jr. an assist trophy? And someone's definately in trouble. Do you know what could happen if someone within Nintendo or ESRB leaks something without the boss's permission? They can make last minute changes. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 22:35, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| The fact is, videos are hard to fake. Maybe not as hard as we might think, since Brawl hacking is rather advanced, but it would still be exceptionally difficult to not only make up movesets for the leaked newcomers, create all the assests for them, ensure there's no obvious bugs, throw in a result screen that perfectly matches known-legit videos, and then finally do what's basically a second fake in the 3DS's bottom screen and ensure it matches up perfectly. The fact that a couple dozen new images have surfaced alongside (which get less likely to be fakes the more of them there are, simply because it becomes so much easier to let an error slip through), plus NoA busting the videos, makes it (in my opinion) quite obvious that this leak is the real deal. Quite simply, it's in a class of its own compared to any other rumour or supposed leak we've seen so far, and there's really no evidence against it. Is it speculation? In the strictest sense, yeah okay. But noteworthy and widespread speculation is indeed within our scope, and this certainly qualifies.
| |
|
| |
| And SeanWheeler, I'm 99.7% sure the game has already gone gold (as of a few weeks ago). Therefore, it is out of the question to make changes, and especially so just to spite a leak (which would also be rude and unprofessional). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Quintonic 22:54, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :: The Bowser Jr gameplay featured a Smash 4 style screen KO, which seems highly unlikely to be something that could be replicated in Brawl.[[Special:Contributions/68.62.241.33|68.62.241.33]] 23:04, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::Well, I'm still hoping somehow this leak is fake. And you said spiting a leak is unprofessional? How many times have Sakurai trolled us? And the famous movie producer George Lucas has spited leakers. You know the part from Empire Strikes Back when Darth Vader reveals his relationship with Luke? George made the line in the script "Obi-Wan killed your father," to avoid leakers. That pissed David Prowse off. Anyway, back to Smash, I'm still hoping this is just some elaborate Brawl hack. *Edit conflict points out the screen KO* What? Man they're good. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 23:12, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::To think the leaker actually was ''from Nintendo'' before he was fired and sued for this... Because of that sudden news flash, I'm starting to accept that it is real and is happening. Will take back some of my old comments here in the meantime. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 00:07, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::;That sounds even more improbable than the leak itself. The whole thing seems more and more like a big bundle of lies. --[[Special:Contributions/66.249.83.56|66.249.83.56]] 00:25, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::I would take that claim with a much larger helping of salt than the leak itself. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Incomperable 00:21, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| We've obtained proof that the images in [http://imgur.com/a/PzeCw this] album are real. In today's pic of the day, the term "Ω Form" is clearly seen in the selected stage's name. The only time this previously appeared is in said album, where there is an option for "Ω Mode" on the stage select. Obviously a codename for switching to a stage's Final Destination mode; regardless, that kind of term would be something ''very'' hard to guess correctly. [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 03:12, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :Not only that, but the Miis are '''the same in both the pic of the day and the leak'''. This should be enough proof that it's real. <span style="background-color: black; border:3px solid blue; border-radius:10px 30px 30px 10px;">[[User:Lasifer|Lasifer]]</span> [[File:MaskedManSignatureSprite.PNG|link=User talk:Lasifer]] 03:41, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::[http://imgur.com/gallery/cTQUE/new For reference]
| |
| To quote, the video, or videos in this case, have to be "clear and unambiguous". So... How is a series of short, 10 second low quality clips clear. Currently, I'm neutral leaning true in regards to the leak, but I think there's enough to doubt it, and that's what I feel is unambiguous - beyond any reasonable doubt. The supposed leak should still be mentioned, ad the characters listed as potential, but until definitive conclusive PROOF (not evidence) surfaces, I think we're jumping the gun. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 04:17, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :The actual recording quality of the video shouldn't be used for the clear argument. Both a low or high recording quality can be used to argue that a leak is either credible or not, depending on presumptions made by the arguer. There isn't an incredible amount of legitimate room to doubt the videos at this point, so if you actually have evidence pointing to the videos being false despite the argument that Toomai just brought up, you should probably bring up those points for further debate. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 06:15, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::Well, I suppose Fair is Fair - I'm just someone who likes being thorough. As long as it's the consensus that the leak is true Beyond Reasonable Doubt, then I don't really care too much. But I've ended up looking like an absolute idiot over something like this, so online or not, I take care. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 06:34, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::It's not a consensus when one side is actively being silenced by the other. --[[Special:Contributions/66.249.83.56|66.249.83.56]] 06:52, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Then continue to bring up your counterpoints and other counterpoints that have yet to be defeated instead of pursuing slacktivism and complaining about it. We have more reasons to believe that this is true than false, but if one side is truly being silenced, then surely, you must have points to bring up. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 12:53, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::::So maybe the leaks can be real. If they are real when the game comes out, I'd be fine with it. But I'm still disappointed about the roster. Why bring back Dr. Mario instead of Mewtwo? Why add Dark Pit as a separate character if he was already a Pit skin? Why is the Duck Hunt dog here? Why take out Wolf if he's less of a clone than Falco? Why isn't Krystal here? Where's Tails? Why is ROB here? Why did they make a group for clones? But hey, I'll still buy the game and enjoy it. At least I can have Sonic fight Mega Man. At least my main characters in Brawl weren't cut (except Snake who I was totally expecting cut). At least they introduced some exciting newcomers. Like Mega Man! But too bad some characters in my wishlist that didn't make it. I'm sure other people have wishlist with characters who don't make it, and that's normal. However, I'm still going to wait for the characters to be up on the official site before adding leaked newcomers like Ganondorf to my Sonic News Network userspace. Fine, you can have Ganon, Shulk and Jr. and do what you want. I'm still hoping for this leak to somehow to be fake. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 13:26, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::Dr. Mario is different enough from Mario to deserve his own slot, Sakurai said this when he revealed Lucina. It's not known whether or not Mewtwo is in the game. Dark Pit, like Dr. Mario, is different enough from Pit (moveset-wise) to have his own slot. Sakurai said not to expect "a lot of 3rd party characters", which counts Tails out because he would overrepresent the Sonic series. R.O.B. has historical significance as a landmark accessory, today he's a collectible and still makes cameos in games across Nintendo universes. The grouped clones is nothing new for one, considering Ganondorf was placed next to C. Falcon in Melee's menu, and secondly, the roster we saw doesn't have everyone unlocked yet, so of course the roster character placements look unconventional. <font face="X-Files">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 13:37, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::Focus on the main issue here. A leak can look as convincing as it gets, but it is not and never will be a replacement for real, actual confirmation from trusted sources. Putting the characters revealed in the leak within the Super Smash Bros 4 confirmed content page is premature at best, as they have not been confirmed. Miles has consistently been dodging this issue by claiming consensus made before any leaks occurred- a consensus which is quickly proving to be false; as a former NIWA administrator myself, I am disappointed in how closed-minded Miles is proving to be in the face of reason. Now that the circumstances have changed they must therefore become even more stringent. The video may not be a hoax, but it could easily be a build that has since been scrapped in favor of something completely different. I should also add that the only evidence of Ice Climbers being cut is a quotation from a reporter which the reporter attributed to Sakurai. Additionally, notice that the game physics are completely different from those which have been shown in previous footage and that all of Shulk's moves are direct copies of existing characters' attacks (specifically, Link and Marth), not to mention that Duck Hunt Dog has had not even a single screenshot's worth of gameplay. The leaker even admitted to openly lying about DLC on two separate occasions. How can we trust someone who has been confirmed to be lying in the past- how do we know the leak itself isn't another lie? The leak is being given way too much benefit of the doubt- by definition, a leak is a mixture of partial truths and lies whose only purpose is to make the person telling them get their 15 minutes of fame. For now, nothing proves the leaks. Again, I propose the following change to the policy:
| |
| *Information derived from leaks can be present on pages, but it must not passed off as confirmed material until it is proven to be confirmed by official sources. --[[User:Anothrgamer1234|Anothrgamer1234]] ([[User talk:Anothrgamer1234|talk]]) 18:34, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :All leaked information is clearly labeled as such. Additionally, we're not taking anything as definitive except what has been shown in video, which is orders of magnitude more difficult to fake. And the physics seemed different in the Shulk battle on YI because it was the end battle after Smash Run, so characters' attributes were altered accordingly. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:29, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::Okay, so how about we wait for real real confirmation? Sure, the evidence may be pretty convincing, but doesn't mean it's really true. Shulk's moves being copies of Link and Marth? Pretty suspicious. Although, Bowser Jr. did splat in the footage... But there's still a chance this can be a hoax. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 19:34, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::I'm wondering why people keep saying this, what do you mean Shulk is using Marth and Link's moves? I only saw one move that was similar (the Dolphin Slash-esque one) all the others seem to either have drastic range differences (such as the presumed Up-Tilt) or completely different animations ("Spin Attack" like move and if you mean that move looks like Marth's down smash, why is he spinning when using it?). Also, Omega stage forms were shown in the leaked pictures, so..... yeah, that's pretty much confirmation. I sincerely doubt they'd be THIS lucky. [[User:Laikue|Laikue]] ([[User talk:Laikue|talk]]) 19:40, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| : the entire leak story is false. [CITATION NEEDED] Oh yeah?' Well, citation GRANTED. http://smashboards.com/threads/the-recent-smash-bros-leak-from-4chan-is-fake-and-heres-more-evidence.364895/ read it. The leak is false. End of story. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Harro|Harro]] ([[User talk:Harro|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harro|contribs]]) 10:02, 27 August 2014 (EDT)</small>
| |
| ::That topic was posted on the 20th, days before the video leaks. It is no longer relevant. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Awesome 10:19, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::Please explain [http://i.imgur.com/29mjLMn.jpg this], [http://imgur.com/gallery/cTQUE/new this], and the video evidence and I will believe that it's fake. <span style="background-color: black; border:3px solid blue; border-radius:10px 30px 30px 10px;">[[User:Lasifer|Lasifer]]</span> [[File:MaskedManSignatureSprite.PNG|link=User talk:Lasifer]] 12:31, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :::OK if your so smart, explain why monolith soft isn't in the copyrights of the game (back of japanese box) if they own shulk? <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Harro|Harro]] ([[User talk:Harro|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harro|contribs]]) 18:48, 27 August 2014 (EDT)</small>
| |
| ::::Because the first thing Nintendo would want to do when they were keeping these characters a secret is reveal them via company implications. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 18:59, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Additionally, Monolith Soft is currently a first-party subsidiary of Nintendo. Nintendo owns a 97% stake in Monolith Soft, compared to say, 32%, in the Pokemon Company. They may not need to be credited separately. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:10, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Nintendo are only obligated to add the copyrights of companies for characters on the box-art itself, not the game. Otherwise where is Ubisoft if there's a Ray-Man trophy in the game? The recent album leak matches up perfectly with the latest official Picture of the Days, there's been video footage that has caused an aggressive take-down from Nintendo and the game is nearly 2 weeks from the Japanese release. The leak isn't false. [[User:FlynnCL|FlynnCL]] ([[User talk:FlynnCL|talk]]) 07:22, 28 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| How about this - let's just let this debate lie, follow the policy as set out now, and if the leak does end up being fake, as it may or may not be proven in just over 2 weeks, then remove the content and have all those crying out fake feel smug about themselves. Because this is seriously getting old now. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 08:16, 28 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :Just because a debate has been going on for a while doesn't mean that it should be stopped just because it's "getting old now". <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 11:30, 28 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| If the Paterson footage was without a shadow of a doubt replicatable by a human, but we still had no intact evidence or bodies and such of a Bigfoot, would Bigfoot by considered scientifically real? No, as there is no confirmation or proof. It's irrelevant whether or not it's convincing, as a wiki they shouldn't be here until they are confirmed. You guys are missing the point.[[Special:Contributions/142.177.93.149|142.177.93.149]] 22:51, 28 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :Bigfoot is considered scientifically implausible because logic extraneous to the Patterson-Gimlin film discounts the possibility of such a creature existing (small populations would prevent it from being sustainable, lack of traces of existence such as shelters or waste, etc.). In our case, logic extraneous to the videos (Nintendo's takedown of videos, hard cuts in video footage suggesting it to be ESRB footage) points to the video's contents as being real.
| |
|
| |
| :And remember: If you want to sound smart, making up words like "replicatable" is not the way to go!
| |
|
| |
| :--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 23:08, 28 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::I wasn't saying bigfoot or the Paterson footage is real, I was simply using a recognizable example that everyone would know. It's a metaphor. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:142.177.93.149|142.177.93.149]] ([[User talk:142.177.93.149|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/142.177.93.149|contribs]]) 07:04, August 29, 2014 (CDT)</small>
| |
| Shulk's official artwork matches the leak, I think this seals it. <span style="background-color: orange; border:3px solid blue; border-radius:10px 30px 30px 10px;">[[User:Lasifer|Lasifer]]</span> [[File:MaskedManSignatureSprite.PNG|link=User talk:Lasifer]] 08:53, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| :All right. I believe the leaks now. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 09:20, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| ::Yep. Game set. We're done here. [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 11:16, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Expand timeframe to include DLC Coverage? ==
| |
|
| |
| As title, just to get rid of the grey area. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 15:37, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :I'm already more or less using it for this purpose. (Although given the more sophisticated fakes like Artsy Omni's Rayman, I may have to specify further on the subject of videos...) [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 16:11, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == What Shall We Do Now? ==
| |
|
| |
| We're approaching 3 years of ''Smash 4'', and I don't think anyone here is going to dispute that the game is old news now.
| |
|
| |
| That leaves the question of what to do with this policy. We could just archive it and be done with it, but I think it'd be better if we turned this into a general guideline that covers any future games in the series.
| |
|
| |
| Thoughts?
| |
|
| |
| --- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 00:00, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
| |
| :It should have been written like that in the first place. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 00:07, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::odamn, was that a callout? lol
| |
|
| |
| ::In any case, I'll see if I can whip up a draft in the next few days or so. This policy is too narrow as-is, but hopefully, we can make it more useful for future editors.
| |
|
| |
| ::--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 00:20, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
| |
Log in
